基于 DNA 超分子水凝胶的保护性 NK 细胞储库用于增强三阴性乳腺癌治疗
Protective NK Cell Reservoir Based on DNA Supramolecular Hydrogel for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Combined PD-L1/CD8 immune phenotyping in breast cancer: exploratory associations across molecular subtypes and insights into possible exhaustion-related immune dysfunction.
Combined PD-L1/CD8 immune phenotyping in breast cancer: exploratory associations across molecular subtypes and insights into possible exhaustion-related immune dysfunction.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
联合 PD-L1/CD8 免疫表型分析可识别乳腺癌中超越传统分子亚型分类的生物学上不同的免疫微环境状态。虽然 PD-L1 阳性与高组织学分级和免疫细胞浸润相关,但在这个以激素受体阳性为主的队列中,PD-L1+/CD8-high 表型在未调整分析中显示出最不利的生存特征,该关联在调整基线转移负荷后减弱至临界显著性。这些发现支持以下概念:PD-L1 表达与丰富的 CD8+ T 细胞浸润同时存在可能并不总是反映有效的抗肿瘤免疫,反而可能与耗竭或功能受损的免疫状态一致。
程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达和CD8+TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)密度是乳腺癌中肿瘤-免疫相互作用的既定生物标志物;然而,它们在分子亚型中联合评估的生物学和预后意义仍未完全明确。本研究旨在表征联合PD-L1/CD8免疫表型,评估其临床病理学关联,并探讨其与分子异质性乳腺癌队列中生存结局的关系。
这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了来自两家机构的137例浸润性乳腺癌患者。通过免疫组织化学分别评估肿瘤细胞(TCs)和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)中的PD-L1表达。同时通过免疫组织化学评估CD8+ TIL密度,并使用预先设定的阈值≥50%将肿瘤分类为CD8-high或CD8-low。基于PD-L1和CD8状态的联合分析,将病例分为四种免疫表型:I型(PD-L1+/CD8-high)、II型(PD-L1+/CD8-low)、III型(PD-L1-/CD8-high)和IV型(PD-L1-/CD8-low)。使用适当的统计学方法分析免疫表型、临床病理特征与生存结局之间的关联。
在137个肿瘤中观察到62个(45.3%)PD-L1阳性,且与更高的组织学分级显著相关(p = 0.020),但与病理肿瘤分期、临床分期分组或淋巴结状态无关。免疫细胞区室中PD-L1表达与CD8+ TIL密度之间存在显著正相关(Spearman ρ = 0.453,p < 0.001),而肿瘤细胞PD-L1表达与CD8+ TIL密度之间未观察到相关性(ρ = -0.021,p = 0.812)。在一项受小细胞计数限制的假设生成性亚组比较中,CD8-high状态在Luminal B型中比在三阴性乳腺癌中更常见(36.0 vs. 13.7%;p = 0.036)。最常见的免疫表型为Type IV(43.1%),而Type I占病例的9.5%。在探索性分析中,Type I表型患者在四组中死亡率最高(23.1%),基于随访的中位生存估计最短(37个月)(log-rank p = 0.014);鉴于事件数较少(总体11例死亡,Type I亚组内3例),且使用的是随访时长与横断面死亡率而非完整标注的时间至事件数据,这些发现应解释为探索性关联,而非确定性预后证据。
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density are established biomarkers of tumor-immune interaction in breast cancer; however, the biological and prognostic significance of their combined assessment across molecular subtypes remains incompletely defined. This study aimed to characterize combined PD-L1/CD8 immune phenotypes, evaluate their clinicopathological associations, and explore their relationship with survival outcomes in a molecularly heterogeneous breast cancer cohort.
This multicenter retrospective study included 137 patients with invasive breast carcinoma from two institutions. PD-L1 expression was evaluated separately in tumor cells (TCs) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) by immunohistochemistry. CD8+ TIL density was also assessed immunohistochemically, and tumors were classified as CD8-high or CD8-low using a predefined threshold of ≥50%. Based on combined PD-L1 and CD8 status, cases were categorized into four immune phenotypes: Type I (PD-L1+/CD8-high), Type II (PD-L1+/CD8-low), Type III (PD-L1-/CD8-high), and Type IV (PD-L1-/CD8-low). Associations between immune phenotypes, clinicopathological characteristics, and survival outcomes were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.
PD-L1 positivity was observed in 62 of 137 tumors (45.3%) and was significantly associated with higher histological grade ( p = 0.020), but not with pathological tumor stage, clinical stage group, or lymph node status. A significant positive correlation was identified between PD-L1 expression in the immune-cell compartment and CD8+ TIL density (Spearman ρ = 0.453, p < 0.001), whereas no correlation was observed between tumor cell PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TIL density (ρ = -0.021, p = 0.812). In a hypothesis-generating subgroup comparison limited by small cell counts, CD8-high status was more frequent in Luminal B than in triple-negative breast cancer (36.0 vs. 13.7%; p = 0.036). The most common immune phenotype was Type IV (43.1%), whereas Type I accounted for 9.5% of cases. In exploratory analysis, patients with the Type I phenotype had the highest mortality rate (23.1%) and the shortest median follow-up-based survival estimate (37 months) among the four groups (log-rank p = 0.014); given the small number of events (11 deaths overall, 3 within the Type I subgroup) and the use of follow-up duration with cross-sectional mortality rather than fully annotated time-to-event data, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory associations rather than definitive prognostic evidence.
Combined PD-L1/CD8 immune phenotyping identifies biologically distinct immune microenvironmental states in breast cancer beyond conventional molecular subtype classification. While PD-L1 positivity was associated with high histological grade and immune-cell infiltration, the PD-L1+/CD8-high phenotype demonstrated the least favorable survival profile in this predominantly hormone receptor-positive cohort on unadjusted analysis, an association that was attenuated to borderline significance after adjustment for baseline metastatic burden. These findings support the concept that concurrent PD-L1 expression and abundant CD8+ T-cell infiltration may not invariably reflect effective antitumor immunity and may instead be consistent with an exhausted or functionally impaired immune state. If validated in larger cohorts with direct assessment of T-cell exhaustion markers, combined PD-L1/CD8 phenotyping may provide clinically relevant insights for immune stratification and patient selection in immunotherapy-oriented approaches.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。