← 返回

机器学习驱动的乳腺癌无病生存期分层整合免疫炎症表型识别与免疫组化验证

英文原题:Machine learning-driven identification and immunohistochemical validation of an integrated immune-inflammatory phenotype for disease-free survival stratification in breast cancer.

查看英文原题

Machine learning-driven identification and immunohistochemical validation of an integrated immune-inflammatory phenotype for disease-free survival stratification in breast cancer.

PubMed 2026/06/18(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

RSF 在该队列中提供了最佳的预后预测性能。

中文摘要

乳腺癌复发风险存在异质性,传统临床病理变量可能无法充分反映免疫相关因素的作用。我们比较多种生存建模策略,并评估整合免疫炎症表型能否改善无病生存期(DFS)分层。

本单中心回顾性研究纳入2020年1月至2025年12月期间接受手术治疗的503例乳腺癌患者。根据病理切片评估间质TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞),并依据治疗前血细胞计数计算全身免疫炎症指数(SII)。整合免疫表型定义为有利型(TIL高/SII低)、不良型(TIL低/SII高)或中间型(其余组合)。采用C指数、时间依赖曲线下面积(AUC)、综合Brier评分(IBS)和决策曲线分析比较基础临床Cox模型、免疫扩展Cox模型、LASSO-Cox、CoxBoost和随机生存森林(RSF)。同时开展常规生存分析、限制性立方样条分析,以及CD8和CD163免疫组化验证。

随访期间,107例患者(21.3%)发生DFS事件。RSF总体表现最佳,12、24、36、48和60个月时间依赖AUC分别为0.867、0.880、0.879、0.893和0.911,且IBS最低(0.100)。在RSF模型中,病理N分期是最重要的预测因子,其后依次为SII、整合免疫表型、Ki-67和淋巴血管侵犯。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,单独按TIL类别分组时DFS无显著差异;而SII高及不良整合免疫表型均与DFS显著较差相关。最终多变量Cox模型中,与有利型相比,不良表型仍独立关联较差DFS(风险比2.53,95%置信区间1.39–4.60;p=0.002)。免疫组化验证显示,与不良表型相比,有利表型CD8+细胞密度较高、CD163+细胞密度较低,CD8/CD163比值较高。

RSF在该队列中具有最佳预后表现。SII和整合免疫表型是具有临床相关性的预测因子,且整合表型获得组织层面生物学证据支持。将机器学习生存模型与实用免疫炎症标志物相结合,可能改善乳腺癌复发风险分层。

展开英文摘要原文

Recurrence risk in breast cancer remains heterogeneous, and conventional clinicopathological variables may not fully capture the contribution of immune-related factors. We compared multiple survival modeling strategies and evaluated whether an integrated immune-inflammatory phenotype could improve disease-free survival (DFS) stratification.

This retrospective single-center study included 503 patients with surgically treated breast cancer between January 2020 and December 2025. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed from pathological sections, and the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was calculated from pre-treatment blood counts. An integrated immune phenotype was defined as favorable (high TILs/low SII), poor (low TILs/high SII), or intermediate (all remaining combinations). A base clinical Cox model, an immune-extended Cox model, LASSO-Cox, CoxBoost, and random survival forest (RSF) were compared using C-index, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), integrated Brier score (IBS), and decision curve analysis. Conventional survival analyses, restricted cubic spline analysis, and immunohistochemical validation with CD8 and CD163 staining were also performed.

During follow-up, 107 patients (21.3%) experienced a DFS event. RSF achieved the best overall performance, with time-dependent AUCs of 0.867, 0.880, 0.879, 0.893, and 0.911 at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, respectively, and the lowest IBS (0.100). In the RSF model, pathological N stage was the most important predictor, followed by SII, integrated immune phenotype, Ki-67, and lymphovascular invasion. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant DFS difference according to TIL category alone, whereas high SII and the poor integrated immune phenotype were associated with significantly worse DFS. In the final multivariable Cox model, the poor phenotype remained independently associated with worse DFS compared with the favorable phenotype (hazard ratio 2.53, 95% confidence interval 1.39-4.60; p = 0.002). Immunohistochemical validation showed higher CD8+ cell density, lower CD163+ cell density, and a higher CD8/CD163 ratio in the favorable phenotype than in the poor phenotype.

RSF provided the best prognostic performance in this cohort. SII and the integrated immune phenotype emerged as clinically relevant predictors, and the integrated phenotype showed tissue-level biological support. Combining machine learning-based survival modeling with pragmatic immune-inflammatory markers may improve recurrence risk stratification in breast cancer.

论文信息

作者
Han S、Ran L、Lian Z、Tian Y、Qin L、Xiang Y、Yan X、Shui C
单位
Affliated Hospital of Anhui West Health Vocational College, Lu'an, Anhui, China.China
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2026
原文标识
PubMed 42396465 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1836156