← 返回

三阴性乳腺癌中化疗和化疗免疫治疗疗效差异的外周免疫动态变化

英文原题:Differential peripheral immune dynamics underlie therapeutic response to chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

查看英文原题

Differential peripheral immune dynamics underlie therapeutic response to chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

PubMed 2026/05/01(内容时间) bioRxiv

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)仍然是最具侵袭性的乳腺癌亚型,治疗选择有限,对免疫检查点抑制剂的反应不一。虽然TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)已被广泛研究,但系统级外周免疫动态与治疗反应和耐药背后的机制性免疫调控的整合仍不明确。

在此,我们将系统级免疫状态建模与通路级机制推断相结合,分析接受紫杉醇单药(化疗)或联合抗 PD-L1 抗体 atezolizumab(联合治疗)治疗的晚期 TNBC 患者外周血单个核细胞的单细胞 RNA 测序。该框架利用治疗分组、纵向采样和临床反应来解析淋巴和髓系区室中协调的免疫程序。使用该方法,我们在治疗前和治疗后识别出不同的治疗特异性和反应特异性免疫状态。化疗应答者显示出治疗前适应性免疫启动,而联合治疗应答者则表现出预先存在的效应 T 细胞活性,并伴有肿瘤组织 PD-L1 表达。相比之下,化疗无应答者在治疗后出现调节性和终末效应程序的持续性免疫失调,而联合治疗无应答者则表现出适应性和固有淋巴区室的适应不良性重塑,包括功能失调的 NK 和代谢重编程的髓系细胞群。在两种方案中,涉及蛋白质翻译、代谢适应和应激信号传导的通路均成为反应的关键调节因素。这些发现表明,协调的适应性-固有免疫动态是治疗疗效的基础,而系统性免疫耗竭和髓系免疫调节则导致耐药。将这些外周免疫程序投射到独立的I-SPY2中,显示与肿瘤免疫表型和病理完全缓解具有一致的关联,支持所识别的系统性免疫状态的普遍性。

我们的研究证明了整合性系统层面方法在将外周免疫状态组织与机制性见解相联系方面的实用性,为TNBC中的免疫应答和耐药提供了信息。

展开英文摘要原文

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains the most aggressive breast cancer subtype, with limited treatment options and variable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. While tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes have been extensively studied, the integration of system-level peripheral immune dynamics with mechanistic immune regulation underlying therapeutic response and resistance remain poorly defined.

Here, we integrate systems-level immune state modeling with pathway-level mechanistic inference to analyze single-cell RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from advanced TNBC patients treated with paclitaxel alone (chemotherapy) or in combination with anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab (combination). This framework leverages treatment arm, longitudinal sampling, and clinical response to resolve coordinated immune programs across lymphoid and myeloid compartments. Using this approach, we identified distinct treatment- and response-specific immune states in pre- and post-treatment.

Chemotherapy responders displayed pre-treatment adaptive immune priming, whereas combination therapy responders exhibited pre-existing effector T cell activity coupled with tumor tissue PD-L1 expression.

In contrast, chemotherapy non-responders developed persistent post-treatment immune dysregulation in regulatory and terminal effector programs, while combination therapy non-responders demonstrated maladaptive remodeling of adaptive and innate lymphoid compartments, including dysfunctional NK and metabolically reprogrammed myeloid populations. Across both regimens, pathways involving protein translation, metabolic adaptation, and stress signaling emerged as critical modulators of response.

These findings suggest that coordinated adaptive-innate immune dynamics underlie therapeutic efficacy, whereas systemic immune exhaustion and myeloid immunoregulation lead to resistance. Projection of these peripheral immune programs onto independent I-SPY2 showed concordant associations with tumor immune phenotypes and pathological complete response, supporting generalizability of the identified systemic immune states.

Our study demonstrates the utility of an integrative systems-level approach for linking peripheral immune state organization with mechanistic insights, informing immune response and resistance in TNBC.

论文信息

作者
Mesrizadeh Z、Mukund K、Subramaniam S
单位
Department of Bioengineering, UC San Diego, Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.United States
文献类型
预印本
期刊
bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026 May 1
原文标识
PubMed 42094437 · DOI 10.64898/2026.04.28.721416