一种用于克服非小细胞肺癌治疗中抗原异质性的多靶向 CAR-T 细胞平台
A Multi-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Platform to Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
这些发现支持采用多靶点CAR-T 策略来应对NSCLC及可能其他实体瘤中的抗原异质性。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:PET/CT-guided management of immune checkpoint blockade and multi-modal profiling following treatment in long-term responders with metastatic lung cancer in the National Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer Germany (nNGM).
PET/CT-guided management of immune checkpoint blockade and multi-modal profiling following treatment in long-term responders with metastatic lung cancer in the National Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer Germany (nNGM).
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
结构化停药策略似乎为长期 ICB 应答者提供了一种安全的方法,能够在广泛进展前更早发现耐药。nNGM 内一项确证性前瞻性非劣效随机试验正在进行中。
肺癌中免疫检查点阻断(ICB)的最佳持续时间仍未明确。对长期应答者进行无限期治疗会增加医疗负担,使患者暴露于可避免的毒性,且没有任何临床或生物学依据或转化数据支持。迫切需要前瞻性策略来确定肺癌中免疫治疗的最佳持续时间。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,来自21个德国国家网络基因组医学肺癌中心(nNGM)的455例在一线ICB为基础的治疗中疾病控制≥2年的患者,被分为PET/CT引导下停药组(队列A,n = 126)或未行PET/CT继续ICB组(队列B,n = 329),并评估总生存期(OS)。对队列A中持续或进展性疾病患者的ICB前后配对肿瘤样本进行了全面基因组分析、组织学TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)定量和空间转录组学分析,以探索晚期耐药机制。
中位随访55个月后,A组显示出显著更长的OS[中位未达到对82个月,风险比0.35(95%置信区间0.18-0.67),P = 0.002],尽管治疗持续时间显著更短(27对45个月,P < 0.001)。停药要么是PET驱动的(A组),要么是由于免疫相关毒性、疾病进展或患者选择(B组)。A组的系统性再活检显示第二原发肺癌(SPLC)发生率高(28%)。所有进展事件在A组中53%仅通过局部(消融)治疗进行管理,而B组为17%。治疗后发生的肿瘤表现出获得性耐药特征,而SPLC则显示出原发性耐药特征,包括低程序性死亡配体1表达、低肿瘤突变负荷和免疫冷肿瘤微环境。
The optimal duration of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in lung cancer remains undefined. Indefinite treatment in long-term responders increases health care burden, exposes patients to avoidable toxicities, and is not supported by any clinical or biological rationale or translational data. Prospective strategies to determine the optimal duration of immunotherapy in lung cancer are urgently needed.
In this retrospective cohort study, 455 patients from 21 National Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer Germany (nNGM) centers with ≥2 years of disease control on first-line ICB-based therapy were grouped into PET/CT-guided discontinuation (cohort A, n = 126) or continued ICB without PET/CT (cohort B, n = 329), and assessed for overall survival (OS). Matched pre- and post-ICB tumor samples from cohort A patients with persistent or progressive disease were analyzed by comprehensive genomic profiling, histological tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte quantification, and spatial transcriptomics to explore mechanisms of late resistance.
After a median follow-up of 55 months, cohort A showed significantly longer OS [median not reached versus 82 months, hazard ratio 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.18-0.67), P = 0.002], despite substantially shorter treatment duration (27 versus 45 months, P < 0.001). Discontinuation was either PET-driven (A) or resulted from immune-related toxicity, progression, or patients' choice (B). Systematic re-biopsies in cohort A revealed a high incidence of second primary lung cancers (SPLC, 28%). All progression events were managed exclusively with local (ablative) treatments in 53% (A) versus 17% (B). Tumors that occurred after treatment exhibited features of acquired resistance, whereas SPLC displayed characteristics of primary resistance, including low programmed death ligand 1 expression, low tumor mutational burden, and immunologically cold tumor microenvironments.
A structured discontinuation strategy appears to provide a safe approach for long-term ICB responders, enabling earlier detection of resistance before generalized progression. A confirmatory prospective non-inferiority randomized trial within the nNGM is underway.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。