← 返回

直肠癌中 TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)、肿瘤细胞密度与新辅助短程放疗反应:来自 MRC CR07 临床试验的转化亚研究

英文原题:Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, Tumour Cell Density, and Response to Neoadjuvant Short-Course Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Translational Sub-Study from the MRC CR07 Clinical Trial.

查看英文原题

Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, Tumour Cell Density, and Response to Neoadjuvant Short-Course Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Translational Sub-Study from the MRC CR07 Clinical Trial.

PubMed 2025/09/17(内容时间) Cancers (Basel) Q2 · IF 4.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

直肠癌较为常见,术前常接受新辅助放疗以降低肿瘤复发风险。然而,放疗获益和副作用因患者而异,目前尚无经过验证的生物标志物可预测治疗应答。肿瘤细胞密度(TCD)和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)密度已被证实是结直肠癌预后生物标志物,但其预测放疗应答的作用尚不明确。本研究评估放疗治疗直肠癌患者中TCD和TIL密度的预后及预测价值。

在MRC CR07临床试验中,对253份治疗前活检及569份切除标本的整个肿瘤区域采用人工点计数法测量TCD。该试验将患者随机分配至新辅助短程放疗(SCRT)组或直接手术对照组。采用MIM软件(英国利兹HeteroGenius有限公司)的深度学习细胞检测技术,在102份活检及对应切除标本(SCRT组73份,对照组29份)的不同肿瘤区域测量TIL密度。低/高TCD和TIL密度截值既采用预设标准,也依据生存数据通过R软件survminer包确定。通过生存分析评估TCD/TIL与总生存期及癌症特异性生存的预后和预测价值。

SCRT组切除标本TCD低于对照组(19.9%,IQR 12.9%–26.7% vs 34.3%,IQR 27.7%–40.5%,P<.001)。对照组切除标本中,低TCD与全因死亡风险升高(HR 2.20,95% CI 1.41–3.44,P<.001)及癌症相关死亡风险升高(HR 2.69,95% CI 1.41–5.13,P=.0026)相关。相比之下,SCRT后切除标本中低TCD与死亡风险降低相关(HR 0.63,95% CI 0.40–0.98,P=.04)。SCRT组放疗前活检TCD低与癌症相关死亡风险降低相关(HR 0.34,95% CI 0.13–0.89,P=.028)。两个试验组中,治疗前活检TIL密度均高于切除标本(2,492 vs 1,304/mm²,P<.001)。活检TIL密度低与全因死亡风险升高相关(HR 2.43,95% CI 1.24–4.76,P=.01)。与对照组相比,SCRT组切除标本TIL密度较低(1,210 vs 1,615/mm²,P<.001);整个肿瘤区域切除标本TIL密度低与死亡风险升高相关(HR 2.55,95% CI 1.11–5.87,P=.027)。

研究支持TCD和TIL密度作为直肠癌定量生物标志物的作用。TCD可用于评估放疗应答程度;直接手术和接受SCRT患者的生存关联方向相反。研究提示TCD可能兼具预后和疗效预测价值。TIL密度未显示预测价值,但呈现了预期的预后关联。

展开英文摘要原文

Background : Rectal cancer is common and frequently treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy prior to surgery to reduce the risk of tumour recurrence.

However, the therapeutic benefits and side effects of radiotherapy can vary between patients, and there are currently no validated biomarkers to predict treatment response. Tumour cell density (TCD) and tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density are proven prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer; however, their utility in predicting radiotherapy response remains unclear.

We assessed the prognostic and predictive value of TCD and TIL density in rectal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Methods : TCD was quantified using a manual point-counting method in 253 pre-treatment biopsies and across the entire tumour area of 569 resection specimens from the MRC CR07 clinical trial, which randomised patients to either neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) or straight to surgery (control). TIL density was measured in 102 biopsies and matched resection specimens (73 SCRT, 29 control) across different tumour areas using deep learning-based cell detection in MIM (HeteroGenius Ltd. , Leeds, UK). Cutoffs for low/high-TCD and TIL density were both pre-defined and derived from survival data using the survminer R package. Survival analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of TCD/TIL in relation to overall and cancer-specific survival. Results : TCD in the resection specimens was lower in the SCRT group (19. 9%, IQR 12. 9-26. 7%) than the control group (34. 3%, IQR 27. 7-40. 5%, p < 0. 001). In control resections, low-TCD was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2. 20, 95% CI 1. 41-3.

44, p < 0. 001) and cancer-related death (HR 2. 69, 95% CI 1. 41-5. 13, p = 0. 0026). In contrast, after SCRT, low resection TCD was associated with a reduced risk of death (HR 0. 63, 95% CI 0. 40-0. 98, p = 0. 04). In the SCRT group, low biopsy TCD prior to radiotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of cancer-related death (HR 0. 34, 95% CI 0. 13-0. 89, p = 0. 028). Across both trial arms, TIL density was higher in pre-treatment biopsies than resections (2492 vs. 1304/mm 2 , p < 0. 001). Low biopsy TIL density was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.

43, 95% CI 1. 24-4. 76, p = 0. 01). The SCRT group had lower TIL density in the resection compared with controls (1210 vs. 1615/mm 2 , p < 0. 001), and low resection TIL density across the whole tumour area was associated with a higher risk of death (HR 2. 55, 95% CI 1. 11-5. 87, p = 0. 027).

Conclusions : Our findings support the role of TCD and TIL density as quantitative biomarkers in rectal cancer patients. TCD can be used to assess the degree of response to radiotherapy, and contrasting survival associations are observed between straight-to-surgery and SCRT-treated patients.

This study raises the possibility of using TCD as both a prognostic and predictive biomarker. TIL density failed to show predictive value but demonstrated expected prognostic associations.

论文信息

作者
Callaghan JP、Jarrett R、Westwood AC、Laye J、Quirke P、Magee DR、Bottomley D、Sebag-Montefiore D
单位
Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.United Kingdom
期刊
Cancers2025 Sep 17
原文标识
PubMed 41008883 · DOI 10.3390/cancers17183040