基于 DNA 超分子水凝胶的保护性 NK 细胞储库用于增强三阴性乳腺癌治疗
Protective NK Cell Reservoir Based on DNA Supramolecular Hydrogel for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Prediction of neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer based on interpretable artificial intelligence.
Prediction of neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer based on interpretable artificial intelligence.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们开发了一种可解释的 AI 模型,利用 H&E 切片预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗的应答。
为开发预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗(NAT)疗效的人工智能模型,我们整合多模态数据并分析肿瘤微环境(TME)特征,以提高模型可解释性。
回顾性分析接受NAT的多中心乳腺癌患者苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色全视野切片(WSI),开发AI预测模型。队列划分为训练集、测试集、内部验证集和外部验证集。使用UNI提取特征,并采用多实例学习(MIL)框架进行分类。通过ROC曲线分析(AUC、精确率、特异度、召回率)评估模型表现。利用TCGA多模态数据,通过差异基因表达谱和通路富集分析(GO、KEGG)探索模型预测的分子机制,并分析TME组分与模型评分的相关性。
在来自两个中心的826例患者中,模型在基于残余癌负荷(RCB)的三项分类任务中均表现出稳健区分能力,其中在任务2(NAT敏感:RCB 0–1 vs NAT耐药:RCB 2–3)中表现最佳;该任务的AUC在训练集、测试集、内部验证集和外部验证集中分别为0.901、0.858、0.808和0.819。分子分析显示,模型预测效能与肿瘤细胞周期过程相关。TME分析发现,模型评分与活化免疫细胞(M0/M1巨噬细胞、树突状细胞)呈正相关,与抑制性细胞(M2巨噬细胞、静息肥大细胞)呈负相关。模型预测评分与TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)密切相关,分类权重和TIL分布存在空间共定位。不同模型评分层级的TIL水平差异显著,支持该模型在预测NAT应答机制方面具有生物学合理性。
我们基于H&E切片开发了一个可解释的乳腺癌新辅助治疗应答AI预测模型。模型预测具有生物学可解释性,与TME变化及TIL空间模式相关,为个体化制定NAT策略提供了新方法。
To develop an AI-based predictive model for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) efficacy in breast cancer, we integrated multimodal data and analyzed tumor microenvironment (TME) features to provide interpretability.
We retrospectively analyzed H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) from a multicenter cohort of breast cancer patients receiving NAT to develop an AI predictive model. The cohort was stratified into training, test, internal validation, and external validation sets. Feature extraction used UNI and classification employed a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework. Model performance was evaluated via ROC curve analysis (AUC, precision, specificity, recall). Molecular mechanisms underlying model predictions were explored using TCGA multimodal data, integrating differential gene expression profiling with pathway enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG). TME component correlations with model scores were also investigated.
The AI model demonstrated robust discriminative capacity across three residual cancer burden (RCB)-based classification tasks in 826 patients from two centers, achieving peak performance in subtask 2 (NAT-sensitive: RCB 0-1 vs. NAT-resistant: RCB 2-3). For subtask 2, AUCs were 0.901 (training), 0.858 (test), 0.808 (internal validation), and 0.819 (external validation). Molecular analysis linked the model's predictive efficacy to tumor cell cycle processes. TME analysis revealed positive correlations between model scores and activated immune cells (M0/M1 macrophages, dendritic cells), and negative correlations with inhibitory cells (M2 macrophages, resting mast cells). Crucially, the model's predictive scores were closely related to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), with spatial colocalization observed between classification weights and TILs distribution. Significant differences in TILs levels occurred across model score strata, validating the model's biological plausibility in predicting NAT response mechanisms.
We developed an interpretable AI model that predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using H&E slides. The model's predictions are biologically interpretable, correlating with TME dynamics and spatial TIL patterns, offering a novel strategy for personalizing NAT treatment strategies.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。