← 返回

转移性结直肠癌中国患者中过继性细胞免疫治疗联合化疗与单纯化疗的比较:一项为药物定价提供依据的成本-效果分析

英文原题:Adoptive cellular immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis to inform drug pricing.

查看英文原题

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis to inform drug pricing.

PubMed 2025/06/09(内容时间) Front Oncol Q2 · IF 3.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在当前定价下,ACI 联合化疗为中国 mCRC 患者提供了显著的临床和经济获益,其成本效果通过多维情景分析和模型评估得到验证。仍需进一步证据来验证和完善这些发现。

研究思路结论见上方概要

评估过继性细胞免疫治疗(ACI)联合化疗与单纯化疗在中国转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中的成本效果,并为药品定价策略提供循证支持。

基于NCT03950154 III期临床试验的数据构建了Markov模型,该试验将202例患者随机分为两组:ACI联合奥沙利铂/卡培他滨/贝伐珠单抗组(n=100)和单纯化疗组(n=102)。分析了临床结局,包括PFS、OS和不良事件。从中国医疗体系角度计算了成本、QALY和ICER。采用概率敏感性分析评估模型稳定性,并辅以情景分析,在三个WTP阈值(中国人均GDP的1.5倍、1.94倍和3倍)下进行了价格模拟。

ACI组相比单纯化疗显示出更优的临床结局,中位PFS为14.8个月 vs. 9.9个月(风险比[HR]=0.60,p=0.009),中位OS为未达到 vs. 25.6个月(HR=0.57,p=0.043)。在20年模拟中,ACI组额外获得1.72 QALY,ICER为$35,881.71/QALY。在基础案例价格(每周期$6,819.45)下,ACI在中国WTP阈值($36,721.86/QALY)内仍具有成本效果。情景分析显示,将模拟时间跨度延长至10年和15年,ICER分别降至$40,804.77/QALY和$37,770.23/QALY。对2,448种模型组合(72条对照组/34条ACI组生存曲线)的系统性交叉验证表明,71.84%的情景符合预设的成本效果标准(ICER范围:$22,204 - $58,360/QALY)。价格敏感性分析进一步表明,当ACI每周期成本降至$1,670.33(对应WTP=1.5×GDP=$18,360.93)、$3,271.06(对应WTP = 1.94×GDP = $23,746.80)和$7,098.9(对应WTP = 3×GDP = $36,721.86)时,成本效果优势仍然存在。

展开英文摘要原文

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACI) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and provide evidence-based support for drug pricing strategies.

A Markov model was constructed using data from the NCT03950154 phase III clinical trial, which randomized 202 patients into two groups: ACI combined with oxaliplatin/capecitabine/bevacizumab (n=100) and chemotherapy alone (n=102). Clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events, were analyzed. Costs, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was employed to assess model stability, accompanied by scenario analysis, with price simulations conducted under three willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds (1.5×, 1.94×, and 3× China's per capita gross domestic product [GDP]).

The ACI group demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone, with a median PFS of 14.8 vs. 9.9 months (hazard ratio [HR]=0.60, p=0.009) and a median OS not reached vs. 25.6 months (HR=0.57, p=0.043). Over a 20-year simulation, the ACI group provided an additional 1.72 QALY, yielding an ICER of $35,881.71/QALY. At the base-case price ($6,819.45 per cycle), ACI remained cost-effective within China's WTP threshold ($36,721.86/QALY). Scenario analysis revealed that extending the simulation time horizon to 10 and 15 years reduced the ICER to $40,804.77/QALY and $37,770.23/QALY, respectively. Systematic cross-validation of 2,448 model combinations (72 control group/34 ACI group survival curves) indicated that 71.84% of scenarios met predefined cost-effectiveness criteria (ICER range: $22,204 - $58,360/QALY). Price sensitivity analysis further demonstrated that cost-effectiveness advantages persisted when ACI cycle costs were reduced to $1,670.33 (corresponding to WTP=1.5×GDP=$18,360.93), $3,271.06 (corresponding to WTP = 1.94×GDP = $23,746.80), and $7,098.9 (corresponding to WTP = 3×GDP = $36,721.86).

At current pricing, ACI combined with chemotherapy provides significant clinical and economic benefits for Chinese mCRC patients, with cost-effectiveness validated through multidimensional scenario analyses and model evaluations. Further evidence is required to validate and refine the findings.

论文信息

作者
Huo L、Liang P、Duan Y、Xu Y、Tang J、Lv Q、Feng R
第一作者单位
Department of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.China
通讯作者单位
School of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.China
期刊
Frontiers in oncology2025
原文标识
PubMed 40496606 · DOI 10.3389/fonc.2025.1590319