← 返回

非转移性结直肠癌中浸润边缘 CD8⁺ T 细胞的预后价值与免疫评分相当:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究

英文原题:Prognostic Value of CD8+ T Cells at the Invasive Margin Is Comparable to the Immune Score in Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicentric Cohort Study.

查看英文原题

Prognostic Value of CD8+ T Cells at the Invasive Margin Is Comparable to the Immune Score in Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicentric Cohort Study.

PubMed 2025/05/01(内容时间) Clin Cancer Res Q1 · IF 10.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

单独 CD8-IM 提供了与 ICS 相当的预后信息。

中文摘要

Immunoscore可预测结直肠癌预后,但因软件复杂及报销问题而难以推广。本研究采用开源方法,通过聚焦单一T细胞标志物,探索非转移性结直肠癌的简化预后模型。实验设计:在一项多中心前瞻性队列研究中,使用QuPath评估非转移性结直肠癌患者侵袭边缘(IM)和肿瘤中心(TC)中的CD3+及CD8+TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)。依据TIL密度(CD3-IM、CD8-IM、CD3-TC及CD8-TC)计算免疫细胞评分(ICS),方法与Immunoscore相似。采用70:30拆分样本,分别在训练集和验证集中估计癌症特异性生存期的校正风险比。通过分类与回归树分析找出预后价值最高的TIL,并将其模型与ICS模型比较预测表现(Brier评分)和区分能力(一致性概率估计)。

中位随访9.0年期间,1260例患者中有203例死于结直肠癌。分类与回归树选出的最佳预后TIL为CD8-IM,截断值231个细胞/mm²。训练集和验证集中,高CD8-IM患者癌症特异性生存均优于低CD8-IM患者(HR分别为.58,95% CI .40–.84;.35,95% CI .21–.60)。训练和验证队列中CD8-IM与ICS生存模型的Brier评分相近;验证集中CD8-IM的生存区分能力略优于ICS(一致性概率估计:CD8-IM .748,ICS .730)。

单独CD8-IM即可提供与ICS相当的预后信息。简化且经济的TIL评估有望改善临床转化并指导早期结直肠癌辅助治疗。

展开英文摘要原文

The Immunoscore predicts colorectal cancer prognosis but faces adoption barriers because of complex software and reimbursement issues. This study used open-source methods to explore a simplified prognostic model in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer by focusing on single T-cell markers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A multicentric prospective cohort study in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer assessed CD3+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in the invasive margin (IM) and tumor core (TC) using QuPath. An immune cell score (ICS), based on TIL densities (CD3-IM, CD8-IM, CD3-TC, and CD8-TC), was calculated similarly to the Immunoscore. A split sample approach (70:30) estimated adjusted HRs for cancer-specific survival in training and validation sets. Classification and regression tree analysis identified the most prognostic TIL, and its model was compared with an ICS model for performance (Brier score) and discrimination (concordance probability estimate).

Over a median follow-up of 9.0 years, 203 colorectal cancer-specific deaths occurred among 1,260 patients. Classification and regression tree-selected CD8-IM was the most prognostic TIL at a cutoff of 231 cells/mm2. Patients with high CD8-IM had better cancer-specific survival than low CD8-IM in both training (HR 0.58, 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.84) and validation sets (HR 0.35, 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.60). Brier scores of CD8-IM and ICS survival models were comparable in both training and validation cohorts, whereas the survival discrimination of CD8-IM slightly outperformed the ICS in the validation set (concordance probability estimate: CD8-IM: 0.748; ICS: 0.730).

CD8-IM alone provided prognostic information comparable with the ICS. Simplified, cost-effective TIL assessments could improve clinical translation and guide adjuvant therapy in early-stage colorectal cancer.

论文信息

作者
Wankhede D、Halama N、Kloor M、Edelmann D、Brenner H、Hoffmeister M
单位
Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.Germany
文献类型
多中心研究 · 观察性研究
期刊
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025 May 1
原文标识
PubMed 40293274 · DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3275