← 返回

结直肠癌中 TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)联合微卫星不稳定性状态的临床意义:系统综述与网络荟萃分析

英文原题:Clinical significance of combined tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

查看英文原题

Clinical significance of combined tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PubMed 2024/05/09(内容时间) Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Q1 · IF 39.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

这项网络荟萃分析的发现表明,无论 MSI 或 MSS 状态如何,仅在 TIL-H 结直肠癌患者中观察到更好的生存。整合的 MSI-TIL 分类应进一步探索,作为早期结直肠癌临床决策的预测工具。

研究思路结论见上方概要

微卫星不稳定性(MSI)状态和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)是结直肠癌中已确立的预后因素。既往评估TIL与MSI状态联合作用的研究,识别出具有独特预后关联的不同结直肠癌亚型。然而,这些研究常受限于样本量,尤其是对于MSI-high(MSI-H)肿瘤,且目前尚无对现有证据的全面总结。我们旨在对文献进行综述,以比较结直肠癌患者中由MSI-TIL整合分类所衍生亚型相关的生存结局。

在这项系统综述和网络荟萃分析中,我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane Library,无语言限制,纳入1990年1月1日至2024年3月13日期间发表的文章。纳入比较了手术切除结直肠癌患者中TIL(高或低)与MSI状态(MSI或微卫星稳定[MSS])不同组合的患者队列。排除关注新辅助治疗或关注其他免疫标志物(如B细胞或巨噬细胞)的研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行方法学质量评估;数据评价和提取由两名评价员独立完成。汇总估计值从已发表的报告中提取。主要结局为总生存期、无病生存期和癌症特异性生存期。采用频率学派网络荟萃分析,比较各结局的风险比(HR)和95% CI。根据P评分、偏倚、效应量及与各结局关联的精确度,对MSI-TIL亚组进行预后排名。本方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023461108)。

在最初确定的 302 项研究中,21 项研究(共包含 14 028 例患者)被纳入系统评价,19 项(13 029 例患者)被纳入 Meta 分析。九项研究被判定为低偏倚风险,其余十项为中等偏倚风险。MSI-TIL-high(MSI-TIL-H)亚型表现出更长的总生存期(HR 0 45,95% CI 0 34-0 61;I 2 =77 7%)、无病生存期(0 43,0 32-0 58;I 2 =61 6%)和癌症特异性生存期(0 53,0 43-0 66;I 2 =0%),其次是 MSS-TIL-H 亚型,其总生存期(HR 0 53,0 41-0 69;I 2 =77 7%)、无病生存期(0 52,0 41-0 64;I 2 =61 6%)和癌症特异性生存期(0 55,0 47-0 64;I 2 =0%)也长于 MSS-TIL-low 肿瘤患者(MSS-TIL-L)。MSI-TIL-L 亚型患者的总生存期(0 88,0 66-1 18;I 2 =77 7%)和无病生存期(0 93,0 69-1 26;I 2 =61 6%)与 MSS-TIL-L 亚型相似,但癌症特异性生存期(0 72,0 57-0 90;I 2 =0%)略长于 MSS-TIL-L 亚型。直接和间接证据的结果高度一致。

展开英文摘要原文

Microsatellite instability (MSI) status and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are established prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Previous studies evaluating the combination of TIL and MSI status identified distinct colorectal cancer subtypes with unique prognostic associations. However, these studies were often limited by sample size, particularly for MSI-high (MSI-H) tumours, and there is no comprehensive summary of the available evidence. We aimed to review the literature to compare the survival outcomes associated with the subtypes derived from the integrated MSI-TIL classification in patients with colorectal cancer.

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library without language restrictions, for articles published between Jan 1, 1990, and March 13, 2024. Patient cohorts comparing different combinations of TIL (high or low) and MSI status (MSI or microsatellite stable [MSS]) in patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer were included. Studies were excluded if they focused on neoadjuvant therapy or on other immune markers such as B cells or macrophages. Methodological quality assessment was done with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale; data appraisal and extraction was done independently by two reviewers. Summary estimates were extracted from published reports. The primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. A frequentist network meta-analysis was done to compare hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for each outcome. The MSI-TIL subgroups were prognostically ranked based on P-score, bias, magnitude, and precision of associations with each outcome. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023461108).

Of 302 studies initially identified, 21 studies (comprising 14 028 patients) were included in the systematic review and 19 (13 029 patients) in the meta-analysis. Nine studies were identified with a low risk of bias and the remaining ten had a moderate risk of bias. The MSI-TIL-high (MSI-TIL-H) subtype exhibited longer overall survival (HR 0 45, 95% CI 0 34-0 61; I 2 =77 7%), disease-free survival (0 43, 0 32-0 58; I 2 =61 6%), and cancer-specific survival (0 53, 0 43-0 66; I 2 =0%), followed by the MSS-TIL-H subtype for overall survival (HR 0 53, 0 41-0 69; I 2 =77 7%), disease-free survival (0 52, 0 41-0 64; I 2 =61 6%), and cancer-specific survival (0 55, 0 47-0 64; I 2 =0%) than did patients with MSS-TIL-low tumours (MSS-TIL-L). Patients with the MSI-TIL-L subtype had similar overall survival (0 88, 0 66-1 18; I 2 =77 7%) and disease-free survival (0 93, 0 69-1 26; I 2 =61 6%), but a modestly longer cancer-specific survival (0 72, 0 57-0 90; I 2 =0%) than did the MSS-TIL-L subtype. Results from the direct and indirect evidence were strongly congruous. INTERPRETATION: The findings from this network meta-analysis suggest that better survival was only observed among patients with TIL-H colorectal cancer, regardless of MSI or MSS status. The integrated MSI-TIL classification should be further explored as a predictive tool for clinical decision-making in early-stage colorectal cancer. FUNDING: German Research Council (HO 5117/2-2).

论文信息

作者
Wankhede D、Yuan T、Kloor M、Halama N、Brenner H、Hoffmeister M
第一作者单位
Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.Germany
通讯作者单位
Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: m.hoffmeister@dkfz.de.Germany
文献类型
系统综述 · 非美国政府资助研究 · 网状荟萃分析
期刊
The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology2024 Jul
原文标识
PubMed 38734024 · DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00091-8