← 返回

数字图像分析和机器学习辅助预测三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应

英文原题:Digital image analysis and machine learning-assisted prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer.

查看英文原题

Digital image analysis and machine learning-assisted prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer.

PubMed 2024/01/18(内容时间) Breast Cancer Res Q1 · IF 6.2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

我们的机器学习流程能够稳健地识别与临床相关的组织学类别,这些类别可预测 TNBC 患者对 NAC 的反应,并可能有助于指导 NAC 治疗的患者选择。

研究思路结论见上方概要

病理完全缓解(pCR)与三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者的良好预后相关。然而,接受新辅助化疗(NAC)治疗的TNBC患者中仅有30-40%达到pCR,其余60-70%存在残留病灶(RD)。肿瘤微环境在TNBC患者NAC反应中的作用尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们开发了一种基于机器学习的两步流程,用于区分TNBC组织活检苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色全切片图像(WSIs)中的各种组织学成分,并识别可预测NAC反应的组织学特征。

来自模型开发队列的85例患者(51例pCR和34例RD)和验证队列的79例患者(41例pCR和38例RD)的治疗前活检H&E染色WSI,通过第一步的分层八折交叉验证策略和第二步的留一法交叉验证策略进行分离。使用切片级组织学标签预测流程和四种机器学习分类器分析WSI的468,043个切片。最佳训练分类器在测试期间使用每个切片的55个纹理特征生成概率谱。预测的组织学类别用于生成不同组织区域空间分布的组织学分类图。患者级NAC反应预测流程使用来自配对组织学分类图的特征进行训练。捕获不同组织学类别间相关空间信息的顶级基于图的特征被提供给径向基函数核支持向量机(rbfSVM)分类器,用于NAC治疗反应预测。

瓦片级预测流程在组织学类别分类中达到86.72%的准确率,而患者级预测流程在模型开发队列中达到83.53%的NAC反应(pCR vs. RD)预测准确率。该模型在独立队列中得到验证,瓦片组织学验证准确率为83.59%,NAC预测准确率为81.01%。对NAC反应预测能力最强的组织学类别对为:pCR对应的肿瘤和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞),RD对应的微血管密度和多倍体巨癌细胞。

展开英文摘要原文

Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with favorable prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, only 30-40% of TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) show pCR, while the remaining 60-70% show residual disease (RD). The role of the tumor microenvironment in NAC response in patients with TNBC remains unclear. In this study, we developed a machine learning-based two-step pipeline to distinguish between various histological components in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images (WSIs) of TNBC tissue biopsies and to identify histological features that can predict NAC response.

H&E-stained WSIs of treatment-naïve biopsies from 85 patients (51 with pCR and 34 with RD) of the model development cohort and 79 patients (41 with pCR and 38 with RD) of the validation cohort were separated through a stratified eightfold cross-validation strategy for the first step and leave-one-out cross-validation strategy for the second step. A tile-level histology label prediction pipeline and four machine-learning classifiers were used to analyze 468,043 tiles of WSIs. The best-trained classifier used 55 texture features from each tile to produce a probability profile during testing. The predicted histology classes were used to generate a histology classification map of the spatial distributions of different tissue regions. A patient-level NAC response prediction pipeline was trained with features derived from paired histology classification maps. The top graph-based features capturing the relevant spatial information across the different histological classes were provided to the radial basis function kernel support vector machine (rbfSVM) classifier for NAC treatment response prediction.

The tile-level prediction pipeline achieved 86.72% accuracy for histology class classification, while the patient-level pipeline achieved 83.53% NAC response (pCR vs. RD) prediction accuracy of the model development cohort. The model was validated with an independent cohort with tile histology validation accuracy of 83.59% and NAC prediction accuracy of 81.01%. The histological class pairs with the strongest NAC response predictive ability were tumor and tumor tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for pCR and microvessel density and polyploid giant cancer cells for RD.

Our machine learning pipeline can robustly identify clinically relevant histological classes that predict NAC response in TNBC patients and may help guide patient selection for NAC treatment.

论文信息

作者
Fisher TB、Saini G、Rekha TS、Krishnamurthy J、Bhattarai S、Callagy G、Webber M、Janssen EAM
第一作者单位
Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA. raneja@uab.edu.United States
期刊
Breast cancer research : BCR2024 Jan 18
原文标识
PubMed 38238771 · DOI 10.1186/s13058-023-01752-y