← 返回

表柔比星/环磷酰胺和多西他赛在乳腺癌患者中的差异性免疫调节效应

英文原题:Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients.

查看英文原题

Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients.

PubMed 2023/11/14(内容时间) J Exp Clin Cancer Res Q1 · IF 14.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

EC 对淋巴细胞的有害影响表明该联合治疗具有强免疫抑制作用。相比之下,D 对淋巴细胞没有影响,但在体内和体外触发刺激性蛋白的分泌,表明对免疫系统具有支持作用。诱导细胞死亡的潜在差异可能是原因。在规划未来乳腺癌免疫治疗联合方案时,应考虑表柔比星/环磷酰胺和多西他赛这些不同的免疫调节作用。

研究思路结论见上方概要

表柔比星/环磷酰胺(EC)和多西他赛(D)常用于早期、高风险或局部晚期乳腺癌(BC)新辅助治疗中的序贯方案。提高缓解率的新方法是将该治疗与免疫疗法如PD-1抑制联合。然而,对淋巴细胞的预期刺激效应可能取决于化疗骨架。因此,我们在一项随机临床试验中分别比较了EC和D的免疫调节效应。

来自ABSG-34试验的154例患者的肿瘤和血液样本可用(76例患者接受四个周期的EC后接四个周期的D;78例患者接受相反的治疗顺序)。在基线和换药时测定了TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)、循环淋巴细胞和14种可溶性免疫介质。此外,用E、C或D处理了六种BC细胞系,并与免疫细胞共培养。

初始4个周期EC治疗使循环B细胞和T细胞分别减少94%和45%。相比之下,接受初始4个周期D治疗的患者未观察到对淋巴细胞有类似影响。大多数免疫介质在EC治疗下降低,而D治疗导致CXCL10、尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物(uPA)及其可溶性受体(suPAR)水平升高。相应地,只有将BC细胞系暴露于D才诱导出与E相比类似的升高。用E处理BC细胞与细胞皱缩和凋亡相关,而D诱导细胞肿胀和细胞在G2期积聚。

展开英文摘要原文

Epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) are commonly used in a sequential regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of early, high-risk or locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Novel approaches to increase the response rate combine this treatment with immunotherapies such as PD-1 inhibition. However, the expected stimulatory effect on lymphocytes may depend on the chemotherapy backbone. Therefore, we separately compared the immunomodulatory effects of EC and D in the setting of a randomized clinical trial.

Tumor and blood samples of 154 patients from the ABCSG-34 trial were available (76 patients received four cycles of EC followed by four cycles of D; 78 patients get the reverse treatment sequence). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, circulating lymphocytes and 14 soluble immune mediators were determined at baseline and at drug change. Furthermore, six BC cell lines were treated with E, C or D and co-cultured with immune cells.

Initial treatment with four cycles of EC reduced circulating B and T cells by 94% and 45%, respectively. In contrast, no comparable effects on lymphocytes were observed in patients treated with initial four cycles of D. Most immune mediators decreased under EC whereas D-treatment resulted in elevated levels of CXCL10, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its soluble receptor (suPAR). Accordingly, only the exposure of BC cell lines to D induced similar increases as compared to E. While treatment of BC cells with E was associated with cell shrinkage and apoptosis, D induced cell swelling and accumulation of cells in G2 phase.

The deleterious effect of EC on lymphocytes indicates strong immunosuppressive properties of this combination therapy. D, in contrast, has no effect on lymphocytes, but triggers the secretion of stimulatory proteins in vivo and in vitro, indicating a supportive effect on the immune system. Underlying differences in the induced cell death might be causal. These divergent immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel should be considered when planning future combinations with immunotherapies in breast cancer.

论文信息

作者
Wimmer K、Sachet M、Ramos C、Frantal S、Birnleitner H、Brostjan C、Exner R、Filipits M
第一作者单位
Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.Austria
通讯作者单位
Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. rudolf.oehler@meduniwien.ac.at.Austria
文献类型
随机对照试验
期刊
Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2023 Nov 14
原文标识
PubMed 37957750 · DOI 10.1186/s13046-023-02876-x