基于 DNA 超分子水凝胶的保护性 NK 细胞储库用于增强三阴性乳腺癌治疗
Protective NK Cell Reservoir Based on DNA Supramolecular Hydrogel for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:The Role of Stromal Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTIL) Intensity and Programmed Death Ligand 1 () Expression in Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (CMH), Indonesia.
The Role of Stromal Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTIL) Intensity and Programmed Death Ligand 1 () Expression in Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (CMH), Indonesia.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
新辅助治疗后的病理应答仍不理想,在Cipto Mangunkusumo医院(CMH)尤为如此。已有研究寻找应答预测因素,如间质TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(sTIL)强度及PD-L1表达;PD-L1已知可阻断sTIL杀伤癌细胞的作用。本研究评估sTIL强度和PD-L1表达作为乳腺癌新辅助治疗应答预测因子的价值。初步数据可用于在当前抗PD-1/PD-L1免疫疗法可及的情况下,更好地制定乳腺癌个体化治疗。
评估Cipto Mangunkusumo医院(CMH)乳腺癌患者的TIL强度、PD-L1表达,以及它们作为新辅助治疗病理应答预测因子的作用。
开展观察性分析性回顾性队列研究,纳入2014年1月至2021年12月在CMH接受活检/活检标本复核、新辅助治疗及乳房切除术的乳腺癌患者。符合纳入和排除标准者共60例,采用全数纳入。通过活检标本免疫组化(抗体克隆22C3)检测PD-L1表达,并以组织病理学方法评估sTIL强度。采用线性回归分析确定新辅助治疗应答的独立预测因子;应答根据乳房切除标本残余癌负荷(RCB)评分评估。
共纳入60名女性患者,中位年龄46岁。91.7%为非特殊型浸润性癌。sTIL中位强度为10%(范围1%至70%);58.3%患者sTIL强度低(≤10%)。28.3%患者PD-L1表达阳性(CPS≥1)。仅8.3%患者达到病理完全缓解(pCR),而90%患者为RCB II至III级。sTIL强度每增加1%,无淋巴血管侵犯及使用紫杉类化疗分别可预测RCB评分降低0.058、0.781和0.594。PD-L1表达与pCR/RCB I级相关(P=0.048),但CPS评分在线性回归分析中不能预测RCB评分。
sTIL强度是RSCM乳腺癌新辅助治疗应答的独立预测因子。PD-L1表达与pCR/RCB I级相关,但CPS评分无法预测RCB评分。
Pathological responses to neoadjuvant therapy were still relatively poor, especially in CMH. Studies had been done to search for predictors of response such as sTIL intensity and expression, which is known to block sTIL action in killing cancer cells. This research assessed sTIL intensity and expression as predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. The preliminary data might be used to better tailored breast cancer patient therapy, considering the availability of anti-PD-1/ PD- L1 immunotherapy nowadays.
To assess TIL intensity, expressions, and their roles as pathological predictors of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (CMH). METHOD: This was an observational analytic retrospective cohort study on breast cancer patients undergoing biopsy/review of biopsy specimens, receiving neoadjuvant therapy and mastectomy in CMH from January 2014 to December 2021. Sixty cases fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Total sampling was done. expression (immunohistochemistry, clone 22C3) and sTIL intensity (histopathology) was examined in the biopsy specimen. Linear regression analysis was done to determine the independent predictors of neoadjuvant therapy response (evaluated in the mastectomy specimen with residual cancer burden/ RCB score).
There were 60 female patients, median age 46 years old. 91,7% had invasive carcinoma of no special type. Median sTIL intensity was 10% (1%-70%). 58,3% patients had low sTIL intensity ( 10%). 28,3% patients had positive expression (CPS 1). Only 8,3% patients had pCR, while 90% patients had RCB class II-III. Every 1% increase in sTIL intensity, no lymphovascular invasion, and taxane chemotherapy were predicted to lower RCB score by 0,058, 0,781, dan 0,594, respectively. expression associated with pCR-RCB class I (p=0,048), but CPS score was not a predictor of RCB score in linear regression analysis. CONSLUSION: sTIL intensity was an independent predictor of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy in RSCM. expression associated with pCR-RCB class I, but CPS score was not a predictor of RCB score.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。