← 返回

三阴性乳腺癌空芯针穿刺活检与手术标本间程序性死亡配体 1 状态的比较

英文原题:Comparison of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Status between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

查看英文原题

Comparison of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Status between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

PubMed 2023/08/01(内容时间) Yonsei Med J Q1 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在 TNBC 中,含 5 个肿瘤芯的 CNB 足以代表 TIL 水平和 PD-L1(22C3)状态。

研究思路结论见上方概要

帕博利珠单抗目前用于治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)以及联合新辅助化疗(NAC)治疗高危早期TNBC。TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)水平和程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)状态是NAC和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗反应的预测因子。我们旨在研究TNBC中空芯针活检(CNB)的PD-L1状态是否能代表整个肿瘤。

共纳入49例在2018年1月至2021年3月期间诊断为TNBC且未接受NAC而直接接受 upfront 手术的患者。在配对的CNB和切除标本中评估PD-L1表达(SP142和22C3克隆)和TIL。分析CNB与切除标本之间PD-L1状态和TIL水平的一致性。

PD-L1阳性在切除标本中更常被观察到。CNB中TIL水平的总体可靠性良好[组内相关系数(ICC)=0.847,p <0.001]。PD-L1状态的一致性分别为良好和一般(SP142,=0.503,p <0.001;22C3,=0.380,p =0.010)。随着CNB核心数量的增加,可靠性和一致性也有所改善,尤其是从5个肿瘤核心开始(TIL,ICC=0.911,p <0.001;PD-L1 [22C3],=0.750,p =0.028)。关于PD-L1(SP142),在5个肿瘤核心时未观察到进一步改善(=0.600,p =0.058)。

展开英文摘要原文

Pembrolizumab is currently used to treat advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and high-risk early TNBC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) level and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status are predictors of response to NAC and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. We aimed to investigate whether the PD-L1 status in core needle biopsies (CNBs) could represent the whole tumor in TNBC.

A total of 49 patients diagnosed with TNBC who received upfront surgery without NAC between January 2018 and March 2021 were included. The PD-L1 expression (SP142 and 22C3 clones) and TIL were evaluated in paired CNBs and resected specimens. The concordance PD-L1 status and TIL levels between CNBs and resected specimens were analyzed.

PD-L1 positivity was more frequently observed in resected specimens. The overall reliability of TIL level in the CNB was good [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.847, p <0.001]. The agreements of PD-L1 status were good and fair, respectively (SP142, =0.503, p <0.001; 22C3, =0.380, p =0.010). As the core number of CNB increased, the reliability and agreement also improved, especially from five tumor cores (TIL, ICC=0.911, p <0.001; PD-L1 [22C3], =0.750, p =0.028). Regarding PD-L1 (SP142), no further improvement was observed with 5 tumor cores ( =0.600, p =0.058).

CNBs with 5 tumor cores were sufficient to represent the TIL level and PD-L1 (22C3) status in TNBC.

论文信息

作者
Choi H、Ahn SG、Bae SJ、Kim JH、Eun NL、Lee Y、Nahm JH、Jeong J
第一作者单位
Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.South Korea
通讯作者单位
Institute of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yooncha@yuhs.ac.South Korea
期刊
Yonsei medical journal2023 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 37488704 · DOI 10.3349/ymj.2023.0090