一种用于克服非小细胞肺癌治疗中抗原异质性的多靶向 CAR-T 细胞平台
A Multi-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Platform to Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
这些发现支持采用多靶点CAR-T 策略来应对NSCLC及可能其他实体瘤中的抗原异质性。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Association of Molecular Profiles and Mutational Status With Distinct Histological Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtypes. An Analysis of the LACE-Bio Data.
Association of Molecular Profiles and Mutational Status With Distinct Histological Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtypes. An Analysis of the LACE-Bio Data.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
高 TMB 在可切除非小细胞肺癌中具有预后作用。高 TMB 组接受 AC 后预后较差,提示该组可能更适合免疫检查点治疗。
辅助化疗(AC)适用于II期和III期肺腺癌(ADC)。利用LACE Bio II数据库,我们分析了各种突变在ADC亚型中的分布,并研究了PD-L1、TMB和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)的预后和预测作用。
从LACE Bio II数据中提取了临床和基因组数据。患者被分为ADC亚型,分组基于其已知的临床行为(贴壁型[LEP]、腺泡型/乳头状型[ACI或PAP]、微乳头型/实体型[MIP或SOL]、黏液型[MUC]及其他)。采用Kaplan-Meier(KM)和对数秩检验比较基于PD-L1、TMB、TILs以及TMB与PD-L1和TILs组合的生存差异。以总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)和肺癌特异性生存期(LCSS)为终点,分析调整后的风险比(HR)。
共识别出375例ADC患者。MIP/SOL是多种生物标志物最常呈阳性的亚型。相对于PD-L1阴性/低TMB,PD-L1阴性/高TMB与更好的OS(HR = 0.46 [0.23-0.89],P = .021)和DFS(HR = 0.52 [0.30-0.90],P = .02)结局相关。高TMB预测使用AC时OS结局更差(风险比之比rHR = 2.75 [1.07-7.04],P = .035)。明显TILs的患者使用AC时DFS(rHR = 0.22 [0.06-0.87],P = .031)和LCSS(rHR = 0.08 [0.01-0.66],P = .019)结局分别更好。在明显TILs/低TMB患者中,AC对DFS也有获益效应(rHR = 0.06 [0.01-0.53],P = .011)。
Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is indicated for stage II and stage III lung adenocarcinomas (ADC). Using the LACE Bio II database, we analyzed the distribution of various mutations across the subtypes of ADCs and studied the prognostic and predictive roles of PD-L1, TMB, and Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs).
Clinical and genomic data from the LACE Bio II data were extracted. Patients were divided into ADC subtypes, in which the grouping was done based on their known clinical behavior (Lepidic [LEP], Acinar/Papillary [ACI or PAP], Micropapillary/Solid [MIP or SOL], Mucinous [MUC] and Others). Kaplan-Meier (KM) and log-rank test were used to compare survival based on PD-L1, TMB, TILs and combinations of TMB with PD-L1 and TILs. Adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) were analyzed with Overall Survival (OS), Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Lung Cancer-Specific Survival (LCSS) as endpoints.
A total of 375 ADC patients were identified. MIP/SOL was the subtype most commonly positive for various biomarkers. PD-L1 Negative/high TMB was associated with better outcomes in terms of OS (HR = 0.46 [0.23-0.89], P = .021) and DFS (HR = 0.52 [0.30-0.90], P = .02), relative to PD-L1 Negative/low TMB. High TMB predicted worse outcome with AC use in terms of OS (ratio of hazard ratio rHR = 2.75 [1.07-7.04], P = .035). Marked TILs had better outcome with AC for DFS (rHR = 0.22 [0.06-0.87], P = .031 and LCSS (rHR = 0.08 [0.01-0.66], P = .019) respectively. There was also a beneficial effect of AC among patients with Marked TILs/low TMB in terms of DFS (rHR = 0.06 [0.01-0.53], P = .011).
High TMB has a prognostic role in resectable lung ADC. The high TMB group had a poor outcome with AC, suggesting that this group may be better served with immune checkpoint therapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。