基于 DNA 超分子水凝胶的保护性 NK 细胞储库用于增强三阴性乳腺癌治疗
Protective NK Cell Reservoir Based on DNA Supramolecular Hydrogel for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:A phase Ib trial of pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel or flat-dose capecitabine in 1st/2nd line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
A phase Ib trial of pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel or flat-dose capecitabine in 1st/2nd line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
对于患有三阴性乳腺癌的女性来说,采用抗程序性细胞死亡 1/配体 1 和细胞毒性化疗的化学免疫疗法是一种有前途的治疗方式,但关于最佳化疗方案和用于患者选择的生物标志物仍存在疑问。
我们报告了一项 Ib 期试验的最终结果,该试验评估了派姆单抗(每 3 周静脉注射 200 毫克)与每周紫杉醇(每周 80 毫克/平方米)或固定剂量卡培他滨(每天两次口服 2000 毫克,每 14 天周期 7 天)在第一线/第二线设置中的情况。主要终点是安全性(接受 2 个周期,没有发生需要停药或延迟 21 天的 III/IV 级毒性)。次要终点是疗效(第 12 周客观反应)。探索性目标是描述治疗随时间的免疫效果,并评估新的生物标志物。该试验表明,两种治疗方案均达到预先指定的安全终点(紫杉醇:87%;卡培他滨:100%)。派姆单抗/紫杉醇的客观缓解率为 29%(n = 4/13,95% CI:10-61%),派姆单抗/卡培他滨的客观缓解率为 43%(n = 6/14,95% CI:18-71%)。在两名患有化疗难治性化生性癌的受试者中观察到部分反应(均为卡培他滨组)。随着时间的推移,两种方案都与显着的外周白细胞收缩相关。反应与临床 PD-L1 评分、未接受既往化疗以及 H&E 基质TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)评分相关,而且还与新型 27 基因 IO 评分和空间生物标志物(淋巴细胞空间偏度)相关。
总之,派姆单抗联合紫杉醇或卡培他滨是安全的且具有临床活性。两种方案都是淋巴细胞清除,突出了细胞毒性化疗的免疫刺激作用与淋巴毒性作用的竞争。有必要进一步探索 IO 评分和空间 TIL 生物标志物。临床试验注册号为NCT02734290。
Chemoimmunotherapy with anti-programmed cell death 1/ligand 1 and cytotoxic chemotherapy is a promising therapeutic modality for women with triple-negative breast cancer, but questions remain regarding optimal chemotherapy backbone and biomarkers for patient selection.
We report final outcomes from a phase Ib trial evaluating pembrolizumab (200 mg IV every 3 weeks) with either weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 weekly) or flat-dose capecitabine (2000 mg orally twice daily for 7 days of every 14-day cycle) in the 1st/2nd line setting. The primary endpoint is safety (receipt of 2 cycles without grade III/IV toxicities requiring discontinuation or 21-day delays). The secondary endpoint is efficacy (week 12 objective response). Exploratory aims are to characterize immunologic effects of treatment over time, and to evaluate novel biomarkers. The trial demonstrates that both regimens meet the pre-specified safety endpoint (paclitaxel: 87%; capecitabine: 100%).
Objective response rate is 29% for pembrolizumab/paclitaxel (n = 4/13, 95% CI: 10-61%) and 43% for pembrolizumab/capecitabine (n = 6/14, 95% CI: 18-71%). Partial responses are observed in two subjects with chemo-refractory metaplastic carcinoma (both in capecitabine arm).
Both regimens are associated with significant peripheral leukocyte contraction over time. Response is associated with clinical PD-L1 score, non-receipt of prior chemotherapy, and the H&E stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte score, but also by a novel 27 gene IO score and spatial biomarkers (lymphocyte spatial skewness).
In conclusion, pembrolizumab with paclitaxel or capecitabine is safe and clinically active. Both regimens are lymphodepleting, highlighting the competing immunostimulatory versus lymphotoxic effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Further exploration of the IO score and spatial TIL biomarkers is warranted. The clinical trial registration is NCT02734290.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。