基于 DNA 超分子水凝胶的保护性 NK 细胞储库用于增强三阴性乳腺癌治疗
Protective NK Cell Reservoir Based on DNA Supramolecular Hydrogel for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Headed?
Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Headed?
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
近年来,在早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的标准新辅助化疗中加入靶向PD-1通路的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已被证明可以提高病理完全缓解(pCR)率,并且无论是否达到pCR,均可改善无事件生存期。复发性TNBC仍然是一种毁灭性的诊断,因此,能够提高早期TNBC治愈机会的新型治疗应迅速纳入标准治疗范式。
然而,约50%的早期TNBC患者仅接受化疗即可达到pCR,而加入ICI存在有时为永久性免疫相关毒性的风险。这提出了一个关键问题:是否所有早期TNBC患者都应在新辅助化疗的基础上接受ICI。迄今为止,尚无预测性生物标志物可用于筛选最可能从ICI中获益的患者;然而,基于高临床风险以及提高pCR率并最终提高治愈机会的潜力,似乎至少所有淋巴结阳性患者都应在新辅助化疗的同时接受ICI。某些较低风险(I/II期)TNBC如果表现出强烈的预先存在的免疫激活(高TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)和/或PD-L1表达),有可能通过ICI联合较低细胞毒性的化疗成功治疗,这需要在临床试验中进一步评估。即使在未达到pCR的患者中,ICI辅助治疗阶段对临床获益的贡献仍不明确,而正在进行的无辅助ICI成分研究的长期数据可能有助于在短期内为我们提供适当策略的信息。同样,对于新辅助 ICI 联合化疗反应不佳的患者,其他辅助治疗的潜在获益,包括卡培他滨和奥拉帕利联合或不联合 ICI,也尚不明确,但基于给予非交叉耐药抗肿瘤药物,这是合理的。
总之,在新辅助化疗基础上加用 ICI 可显著改善抗肿瘤 T 细胞反应的质量和数量,提示无复发生存的改善是通过更好的免疫保护来抵御癌症实现的。未来,开发靶向肿瘤特异性 T 细胞的 ICI 药物可能有利地改变毒性特征,改善幸存者的风险-获益比。
Recently, the addition of PD-1 pathway targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been shown to improve rates of pathological complete response (pCR), as well as event-free survival regardless of attainment of pCR. Recurrent TNBC remains a devastating diagnosis and thus novel treatments that improve chance of cure in early-stage TNBC should be promptly integrated into standard of care paradigms.
However, approximately 50% of patients with early TNBC will experience pCR with chemotherapy alone, and the addition of ICI carries the risk of sometimes permanent immune-related toxicities. This raises the critical question whether all early-stage TNBC patients should receive ICI in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. As yet, there is no predictive biomarker to select patients most likely to benefit from ICI; however, it would seem that at least all node positive patients should receive an ICI with their neoadjuvant chemotherapy, on the basis of high clinical risk and potential to increase their pCR rate and ultimately the chance of cure.
It is plausible that some lower-risk (stage I/II) TNBC demonstrating strong pre-existing immune activation (high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and/or PD-L1 expression) may be successfully treated with ICI in combination with less cytotoxic chemotherapy, and this requires further evaluation in clinical trials.
The contribution of the adjuvant phase of ICI on clinical benefit is unclear even in patients who do not achieve a pCR and long-term data from ongoing studies without adjuvant ICI component may help inform us on an appropriate strategy in the short term. Similarly, the potential benefit of other adjuvant therapies in patients with poor response to neoadjuvant ICI with chemotherapy, including capecitabine and olaparib with or without ICI, is also unknown, but is rational on the basis of administering a non-cross-resistant anti-tumour agent.
In conclusion, the addition of neoadjuvant ICI to chemotherapy significantly improves both the quality and quantity of the anti-tumour T cell response, suggesting that improvements in recurrence-free survival occur through better immune protection from cancer. In the future, development of ICI agents that target tumour-specific T cells may favourably alter the toxicity profile, improving the risk-benefit ratio for survivors.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。