基于 DNA 超分子水凝胶的保护性 NK 细胞储库用于增强三阴性乳腺癌治疗
Protective NK Cell Reservoir Based on DNA Supramolecular Hydrogel for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Predicting neoadjuvant treatment response in triple-negative breast cancer using machine learning.
Predicting neoadjuvant treatment response in triple-negative breast cancer using machine learning.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们的结果强调,NAC 反应预测模型应基于联合而非孤立的生物标志物。我们的研究提供了有力证据,支持使用基于 ML 的模型预测 TNBC 患者的 NAC 反应。
新辅助化疗(NAC)是早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的标准治疗方案。NAC的主要终点是病理完全缓解(pCR)。NAC仅能使30%~40%的TNBC患者达到pCR。TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)、Ki67和磷酸化组蛋白H3(pH3)是少数已知的可预测NAC反应的生物标志物。目前,缺乏对这些生物标志物在预测NAC反应中联合价值的系统评价。在本研究中,采用基于监督机器学习(ML)的方法,综合评估了来自H&E和IHC染色活检组织的标志物的预测价值。识别预测性生物标志物可通过将TNBC患者精确分层为应答者和部分应答者或无应答者,从而有助于指导治疗决策。
对核心针活检组织(n=76)的连续切片进行H&E染色,并针对Ki67和pH3标志物进行免疫组化染色,随后生成全切片图像(WSI)。将所得WSI三联图像与作为参考的H&E WSI进行共配准。分别使用标注的H&E、Ki67和pH3图像训练基于掩膜区域的CNN(MRCNN)模型,用于检测肿瘤细胞、间质性和瘤内TIL(sTIL和tTIL)、Ki67+和pH3+细胞。将感兴趣细胞密度高的顶部图像斑块识别为热点。通过训练多种ML模型,并通过准确度、曲线下面积和混淆矩阵分析评估其性能,确定用于NAC反应预测的最佳分类器。
当热点区域通过tTIL计数确定,并且每个热点由tTILs、sTILs、肿瘤细胞、Ki67+和pH3+特征来代表时,获得了最高的预测准确性。无论采用何种热点选择指标,在患者层面上,多种组织学特征(tTILs、sTILs)和分子生物标志物(Ki67和pH3)的互补使用均产生了排名最高的性能。
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard treatment for early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The primary endpoint of NAC is a pathological complete response (pCR). NAC results in pCR in only 30%â€"40% of TNBC patients. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), Ki67 and phosphohistone H3 (pH3) are a few known biomarkers to predict NAC response. Currently, systematic evaluation of the combined value of these biomarkers in predicting NAC response is lacking. In this study, the predictive value of markers derived from H&E and IHC stained biopsy tissue was comprehensively evaluated using a supervised machine learning (ML)-based approach. Identifying predictive biomarkers could help guide therapeutic decisions by enabling precise stratification of TNBC patients into responders and partial or non-responders.
Serial sections from core needle biopsies (n=76) were stained with H&E, and immunohistochemically for the Ki67 and pH3 markers, followed by whole slide image (WSI) generation. The resulting WSI triplets were co-registered with H&E WSIs serving as the reference. Separate mask region-based CNN (MRCNN) models were trained with annotated H&E, Ki67 and pH3 images for detecting tumor cells, stromal and intratumoral TILs (sTILs and tTILs), Ki67 + , and pH3 + cells. Top image patches with a high density of cells of interest were identified as hotspots. Best classifiers for NAC response prediction were identified by training multiple ML models, and evaluating their performance by accuracy, area under curve, and confusion matrix analyses.
Highest prediction accuracy was achieved when hotspot regions were identified by tTIL counts and each hotspot was represented by measures of tTILs, sTILs, tumor cells, Ki67 + , and pH3 + features. Regardless of the hotspot selection metric, a complementary use of multiple histological features (tTILs, sTILs) and molecular biomarkers (Ki67 and pH3) resulted in top ranked performance at the patient level.
Overall, our results emphasize that prediction models for NAC response should be based on biomarkers in combination rather than in isolation. Our study provides compelling evidence to support the use of ML-based models to predict NAC response in patients with TNBC.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。