一种用于克服非小细胞肺癌治疗中抗原异质性的多靶向 CAR-T 细胞平台
A Multi-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Platform to Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
这些发现支持采用多靶点CAR-T 策略来应对NSCLC及可能其他实体瘤中的抗原异质性。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Role of Surgical Pathologist for the Detection of Immuno-oncologic Predictive Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancers.
Role of Surgical Pathologist for the Detection of Immuno-oncologic Predictive Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancers.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
直到最近,手术、化疗和放疗一直是非小细胞癌(NSCLCs)治疗的主要手段。然而,分子免疫学的最新进展揭示了调节细胞免疫反应机制的一些复杂性,并促使成功靶向免疫检查点以增强抗肿瘤T细胞反应。免疫检查点分子如细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白-4、程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1和程序性死亡配体(PD-L)1已被证明在逃避免疫监视中发挥核心作用。
因此,这些分子已成为抑制剂靶向的对象,用于癌症治疗,构成了免疫疗法的基础。晚期NSCLC已成为任何癌症中免疫疗法获益的典范。治疗决策基于肿瘤细胞上PD-L1的表达以及驱动突变的存在与否。PD-L1高表达(≥50%)且无驱动突变的患者接受单药免疫治疗,而对于所有其他PD-L1表达水平较低的患者,首选化疗与免疫治疗的联合方案。
因此,PD-L1阻断剂是唯一获批用于无任何致癌驱动突变的晚期NSCLC的免疫治疗药物。然而,鉴于PD-L1在时间和空间上的动态特性,PD-L1免疫组化可能并非最佳生物标志物,且无论PD-L1表达如何,均可能观察到获益。每种免疫治疗分子的处方均基于由美国食品药品监督管理局批准的伴随诊断检测所评估的PD-L1表达水平。其他已研究的生物标志物包括肿瘤突变负荷、T效应细胞特征、TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)、放射组学检测、炎症指数、免疫相关不良事件的有无及特定驱动突变,以及肠道和局部微生物组。目前,这些生物标志物均未常规用于NSCLC免疫治疗的临床决策过程。
然而,在个别病例中,它们可作为常规治疗的有用辅助手段。本综述描述了我们对生物标志物作为免疫检查点分子应答预测因子作用的当前理解。首先简要讨论了一般癌症免疫学,特别是NSCLC中的癌症免疫学。最后,描述了用于改进生物标志物检测的实验室技术的最新进展。
Until very recently, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy have been the mainstay of treatment in non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLCs).
However, recent advances in molecular immunology have unveiled some of the complexity of the mechanisms regulating cellular immune responses and led to the successful targeting of immune checkpoints in attempts to enhance antitumor T-cell responses. Immune checkpoint molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4, programmed cell death protein-1, and programmed death ligand (PD-L) 1 have been shown to play central roles in evading cancer immunity.
Thus, these molecules have been targeted by inhibitors for the management of cancers forming the basis of immunotherapy. Advanced NSCLC has been the paradigm for the benefits of immunotherapy in any cancer. Treatment decisions are made based on the expression of PD-L1 on the tumor cells and the presence or absence of driver mutations.
Patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) and no driver mutations are treated with single-agent immunotherapy whereas, for all other patients with a lower level of PD-L1 expression, a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy is preferred.
Thus, PD-L1 blockers are the only immunotherapeutic agents approved in advanced NSCLC without any oncogenic driver mutations. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, however, may not be the best biomarker in view of its dynamic nature in time and space, and the benefits may be seen regardless of PD -L1 expression. Each immunotherapy molecule is prescribed based on the levels of PD-L1 expression as assessed by a Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic assay.
Other biomarkers that have been studied include tumor mutational burden, the T-effector signature, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, radiomic assays, inflammation index, presence or absence of immune-related adverse events and specific driver mutations, and gut as well as local microbiome. At the current time, none of these biomarkers are routinely used in the clinical decision-making process for immunotherapy in NSCLC.
However, in individual cases, they can be useful adjuncts to conventional therapy. This review describes our current understanding of the role of biomarkers as predictors of response to immune checkpoint molecules. To begin with a brief on cancer immunology in general and in NSCLC, in particular, is discussed. In the end, recent advancements in laboratory techniques for refining biomarker assays are described.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。