一种用于克服非小细胞肺癌治疗中抗原异质性的多靶向 CAR-T 细胞平台
A Multi-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Platform to Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
这些发现支持采用多靶点CAR-T 策略来应对NSCLC及可能其他实体瘤中的抗原异质性。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:An immune indicator based on BTK and DPEP2 identifies hot and cold tumors and clinical treatment outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma.
An immune indicator based on BTK and DPEP2 identifies hot and cold tumors and clinical treatment outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
肺腺癌(LUAD)免疫“热”与“冷”肿瘤的异质性会影响免疫治疗及其他常见治疗,但有效识别免疫表型的生物标志物仍不足。研究者通过文献整理获得免疫特征,包括巨噬细胞/单核细胞、干扰素反应、TGF-β反应、IL-12反应、淋巴细胞活化及细胞外基质相关反应,据此对患者聚类;再以WGCNA、单因素分析和LASSO-Cox筛选关键基因并建立风险特征,比较高低风险患者临床病理特征、药物敏感性、免疫浸润和治疗效果。热型患者免疫活性更高,MHC、细胞毒性、免疫、基质和ESTIMATE评分更高,免疫细胞及TIL更多,生存也较好。BTK和DPEP2与免疫表型高度相关,并组成风险指标。高风险偏向冷型,低风险偏向热型;低风险患者临床表现、药物敏感性、免疫活性以及免疫治疗和常见辅助治疗效果更佳。该BTK/DPEP2指标可用于预后及评估免疫、化疗和放疗效果,有望支持LUAD个体化精准治疗。
In lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), immune heterogeneity of hot and cold tumors has been recognized as one of the major factors affecting immunotherapy and other common treatments.
However, there is still a lack of biomarkers that can effectively identify the immunophenotype of cold and hot tumors. First, the immune signatures were obtained based on literature mining, including macrophage/monocyte, IFN- response, TGF- response, IL12 response, lymphocyte activation, and ECM/Dve/immune response.
Subsequently, LUAD patients were further clustered into different immune phenotypes based on these immune signatures. Next, the key genes related to the immune phenotypes were screened by WGCNA analysis, univariate analysis, and lasso-cox analysis, and the risk signature was established via the key genes.
In additional, we compared the clinicopathological characteristics, drug sensitivity, the abundance of immune infiltration, and the efficacy of immunotherapy and commonly used therapies between patients in the high- and low-risk groups in LUAD. LUAD patients were divided into immune hot phenotype and immune cold phenotype groups. The clinical presentation showed that patients with the immune hot phenotype had higher immunoactivity (including higher MHC, CYT, immune, stromal, ESTIMATE scores, higher abundance of immune cell infiltration, higher abundance of TIL, and enrichment of immune-enriched subtypes) and better survival outcomes than those with the immune cold phenotype.
Subsequently, WGCNA analysis, univariate analysis, and lasso-cox analysis identified the genes highly associated with the immune phenotype: BTK and DPEP2. The risk signature, consisting of BTK and DPEP2, is highly correlated with the immune phenotype.
High-risk scores were enriched in patients with immune cold phenotype and low-risk scores were enriched in patients with immune hot phenotype. Compared to the high-risk group, the low-risk group had better clinical performance, higher drug sensitivity, and a higher degree of immunoactivity, as well as better efficacy in receiving immunotherapy and common adjuvant therapy.
This study developed an immune indicator consisting of BTK and DPEP2 based on the heterogeneity of hot and cold Immunophenotypes of the tumor microenvironment. This indicator has good efficacy in predicting prognosis and assessing the efficacy of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. It has the potential to facilitate personalized and precise treatment of LUAD in the future.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。