← 返回

根据程序性死亡配体 1 表达与免疫浸润对肿瘤免疫微环境分型可预测晚期 NSCLC 患者免疫治疗联合化疗的疗效

英文原题:Classification of Tumor Immune Microenvironment According to Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression and Immune Infiltration Predicts Response to Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Patients With NSCLC.

查看英文原题

Classification of Tumor Immune Microenvironment According to Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression and Immune Infiltration Predicts Response to Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Patients With NSCLC.

PubMed 2023/03/21(内容时间) J Thorac Oncol Q1 · IF 23.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

只有 PD-L1 高表达且免疫浸润高的患者才能从晚期 NSCLC 一线化疗联合免疫治疗中获益。对于缺乏 PD-L1 表达或免疫浸润的患者,单独化疗可能是更好的治疗选择,以避免不必要的毒性和经济负担。

研究思路结论见上方概要

根据适应性免疫抵抗机制,肿瘤免疫微环境(TIME)分为四种类型:(1)程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)阴性和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)阴性(I型);(2)PD-L1阳性和TIL阳性(II型);(3)PD-L1阴性和TIL阳性(III型);(4)PD-L1阳性和TIL阴性(IV型)。然而,TIME分类模型与免疫治疗疗效之间的关系尚未在晚期NSCLC患者中通过任何大规模随机对照临床试验得到验证。

基于ORIENT-11研究的RNA测序和免疫组化数据,我们优化了TIME分类模型,并评估了其对免疫治疗联合化疗疗效的预测价值。

通过ESTIMATE方法计算的PD-L1 mRNA表达和免疫评分是免疫治疗联合化疗疗效的最强预测因子。因此,它们被确定为TIME分类系统的优化定义。在联合治疗与单纯化疗的比较中,只有高免疫评分和高PD-L1 mRNA表达的II型亚群与改善的无进展生存期(PFS)(风险比=0.12,95%置信区间:0.06-0.25,p<0.001)和总生存期(风险比=0.27,95%置信区间:0.13-0.55,p<0.001)显著相关。在联合治疗组中,II型亚群的生存时间要长得多,甚至未达到中位PFS或总生存期,但其他三个亚群则倾向于具有相似的PFS。在化疗组中,生存结局与TIME亚型之间没有显著关联。

展开英文摘要原文

On the basis of RNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry data from the ORIENT-11 study, we optimized the TIME classification model and evaluated its predictive value for the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy.

PD-L1 mRNA expression and immune score calculated by the ESTIMATE method were the strongest predictors for the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. Therefore, they were determined as the optimized definition of the TIME classification system. When compared between combination therapy and chemotherapy alone, only the type II subpopulation with high immune score and high PD-L1 mRNA expression was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.25, p < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.55, p < 0.001). In the combination group, the type II subpopulation had a much longer survival time, not even reaching the median PFS or overall survival, but the other three subpopulations were susceptible to having similar PFS. In the chemotherapy group, there was no marked association between survival outcomes and TIME subtypes.

Only patients with both high PD-L1 expression and high immune infiltration could benefit from chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. For patients lacking either PD-L1 expression or immune infiltration, chemotherapy alone might be a better treatment option to avoid unnecessary toxicities and financial burdens.

论文信息

作者
Sun D、Liu J、Zhou H、Shi M、Sun J、Zhao S、Chen G、Zhang Y
第一作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: zhangli@sysucc.org.cn.China
文献类型
随机对照试验 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2023 Jul
原文标识
PubMed 36948245 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.03.012