← 返回

癌症基因组分析计划 HOPE 中高突变实体瘤免疫状态的特征分析

英文原题:Characterization of the Immunological Status of Hypermutated Solid Tumors in the Cancer Genome Analysis Project HOPE.

查看英文原题

Characterization of the Immunological Status of Hypermutated Solid Tumors in the Cancer Genome Analysis Project HOPE.

PubMed 2022/07/01(内容时间) Anticancer Res Q4 · IF 1.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

与 TMB-H 组相比,TMB-UL 组预后较好的一个可能机制是 TMB-UL 组具有免疫抑制与免疫刺激之间的平衡。

中文摘要

多项报告显示,高肿瘤突变负荷(TMB-H)与癌症预后良好密切相关,但针对不同TMB状态与实体瘤患者总生存期关系的研究有限。

本研究分析HOPE项目中5,072名癌症患者的TMB状态与总生存期关系,并阐明TMB-H组预后良好的具体机制。所有肿瘤按TMB分为极低(UL)、低(L)、中等(I)和高(H)四组。

TMB-H组预后优于TMB-I和TMB-L组,但不优于TMB-UL组。分析293个免疫应答相关基因表达发现,TMB-H组相较TMB-I和TMB-L组有17个基因上调,其中CD274和干扰素γ(IFNG)被确定为良好预后因素。肿瘤内免疫细胞分析显示,TMB-H组耗竭CD8+ T细胞、活化效应CD8+ T细胞和NK细胞比例显著较高。TMB-H组的T细胞受体谱数量及多样性均匀度评分(DE50)低于TMB-UL组;但DE50与新抗原表位肽的结合或洗脱亲和力无关。

与TMB-H组相比,TMB-UL组预后良好的一个可能机制是其免疫抑制和免疫刺激之间较为平衡。

展开英文摘要原文

Many reports demonstrate that a high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) is closely associated with good prognosis of cancer. However, specific studies investigating the association of various TMB statuses with overall survival in patients with solid tumors are scarce.

In the present study, we investigated the association of TMB status with overall survival in 5,072 patients with cancer from the HOPE project and clarified the specific mechanism responsible for the good prognosis of the TMB-H group. All tumors were classified into one of four groups based on TMB: ultralow (UL), low (L), intermediate (I) and high (H).

The TMB-H group had a better prognosis than the TMB-I and TMB-L groups, but not than the TMB-UL group. Analyzing the expression of 293 immune response-associated genes, 17 genes were up-regulated in the TMB-H group compared to the TMB-I and TNB-L groups, and two genes [CD274 and interferon- (IFNG)] were identified as good prognostic factors. Analysis of immune cell populations inside tumors demonstrated that the frequencies of exhausted CD8 + T-cells, activated effector CD8 + T-cells and natural killer cells were significantly higher in the TMB-H group. The T-cell receptor repertoire numbers and the diversity evenness score (DE50) were lower in the TMB-H group than in TMB-UL group; however, no association of the DE50 value with the binding or elution affinity of epitope peptides from neoantigens was found.

One possible mechanism for the good prognosis of the TMB-UL group compared to the TMB-H group might be that the TMB-UL group features a balance between immunosuppression and immunostimulation.

论文信息

作者
Akiyama Y、Kondou R、Iizuka A、Miyata H、Maeda C、Kanematsu A、Ashizawa T、Nagashima T
单位
Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan; y.akiyama@scchr.jp.Japan
期刊
Anticancer research2022 Jul
原文标识
PubMed 35790264 · DOI 10.21873/anticanres.15840