← 返回

三阴性乳腺癌的免疫治疗:从分子生物学到临床实践

英文原题:Immune-Based Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: From Molecular Biology to Clinical Practice.

查看英文原题

Immune-Based Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: From Molecular Biology to Clinical Practice.

PubMed 2022/04/23(内容时间) Cancers (Basel) Q2 · IF 4.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)多年来在治疗选择方面一直被视为一种孤儿病,传统化疗(CT)仍是大多数患者的主要治疗手段。尽管乳腺癌(BC)历来被认为是一种“冷肿瘤”,但基因组学领域的激动进展使得TNBC的分子图谱和免疫特征得以表征,从而为新型治疗策略打开了大门,包括免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)、聚ADP-核糖聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂和抗体药物偶联物(ADCs)。特别是,与标准化疗相比,基于免疫的治疗方法已被证明可改善转移性PD-L1阳性TNBC的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并在早期阶段提高病理完全缓解率,无论PD-L1表达如何。迄今为止,PD-L1已被广泛用作ICIs反应的预测因子;然而,许多患者并未从免疫治疗的加入中获益。

因此,PD-L1并非可靠的疗效预测生物标志物,其准确性仍存在争议,原因在于缺乏关于所采用检测方法、抗体和评分系统的共识,以及PD-L1状态的空间和时间异质性。在精准医学时代,迫切需要识别BC免疫肿瘤学领域中除PD-L1表达之外更敏感的生物标志物。通过对肿瘤微环境(TME)的表征、外周血分析以及免疫基因特征的评估,已探索出新的潜在生物标志物,如肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)、微卫星不稳定性/错配修复缺陷(MSI/dMMR)状态、基因组和表观基因组改变以及TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)。本综述旨在总结关于BC免疫图谱以及为支持TNBC中基于ICI的治疗而提出的生物标志物的最新知识,并概述增强免疫反应以克服耐药机制的潜在策略。

展开英文摘要原文

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been considered for many years an orphan disease in terms of therapeutic options, with conventional chemotherapy (CT) still representing the mainstay of treatment in the majority of patients. Although breast cancer (BC) has been historically considered a "cold tumor", exciting progress in the genomic field leading to the characterization of the molecular portrait and the immune profile of TNBC has opened the door to novel therapeutic strategies, including Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs).

In particular, compared to standard CT, the immune-based approach has been demonstrated to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic PD-L1-positive TNBC and the pathological complete response rate in the early setting, regardless of PD-L1 expression. To date, PD-L1 has been widely used as a predictor of the response to ICIs; however, many patients do not benefit from the addition of immunotherapy.

Therefore, PD-L1 is not a reliable predictive biomarker of the response, and its accuracy remains controversial due to the lack of a consensus about the assay, the antibody, and the scoring system to adopt, as well as the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the PD-L1 status. In the precision medicine era, there is an urgent need to identify more sensitive biomarkers in the BC immune oncology field other than just PD-L1 expression.

Through the characterization of the tumor microenvironment (TME), the analysis of peripheral blood and the evaluation of immune gene signatures, novel potential biomarkers have been explored, such as the Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair Deficiency (MSI/dMMR) status, genomic and epigenomic alterations and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).

This review aims to summarize the recent knowledge on BC immunograms and on the biomarkers proposed to support ICI-based therapy in TNBC, as well as to provide an overview of the potential strategies to enhance the immune response in order to overcome the mechanisms of resistance.

论文信息

作者
Carlino F、Diana A、Piccolo A、Ventriglia A、Bruno V、De Santo I、Letizia O、De Vita F
单位
Department of Precision Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.Italy
文献类型
综述
期刊
Cancers2022 Apr 23
原文标识
PubMed 35565233 · DOI 10.3390/cancers14092102