基于 DNA 超分子水凝胶的保护性 NK 细胞储库用于增强三阴性乳腺癌治疗
Protective NK Cell Reservoir Based on DNA Supramolecular Hydrogel for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatment with or without atezolizumab in triple-negative, early high-risk and locally advanced breast cancer: NeoTRIP Michelangelo randomized study.
Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatment with or without atezolizumab in triple-negative, early high-risk and locally advanced breast cancer: NeoTRIP Michelangelo randomized study.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在 TNBC 女性患者中,将 atezolizumab 加入 nab-paclitaxel 和 carboplatin 并未显著提高 pCR 率。在多变量分析中,PD-L1 表达是影响 pCR 率的最显著因素(OR 2.08)。EFS 的持续随访正在进行中,分子研究也在进行中。
高危三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的特征是预后差、快速进展至转移阶段以及对化疗产生耐药性,因此是一个需要新治疗方法的领域。程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达是肿瘤对TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)产生耐药的适应性机制,而TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)反过来是对化疗产生应答所必需的。总体而言,现有数据支持以下概念:阻断PD-L1/程序性细胞死亡蛋白1检查点可能提高经典化疗的疗效。
280例TNBC患者被纳入这项多中心研究(NCT002620280),并随机接受新辅助卡铂AUC 2和nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m²静脉给药(i.v.),在第1天和第8天给药,不联合(n = 142)或联合(n = 138)atezolizumab 1200 mg i.v.第1天给药。两种方案均在手术前每3周给药一次,共8个周期,随后给予4个周期的辅助蒽环类方案。本研究的主要目的是比较无事件生存期(EFS),一个重要次要目的是病理完全缓解率(pCR定义为乳腺和淋巴结中无浸润性细胞)。所有疗效终点的主要人群为意向治疗(ITT)人群。
ITT分析显示,atezolizumab治疗后的pCR率(48.6%)与未使用atezolizumab相比[44.4%:比值比(OR)1.18;95%置信区间0.74-1.89;P = 0.48],未达到统计学显著性。两种方案的治疗相关不良事件相似,但atezolizumab的严重不良事件总体发生率和肝转氨酶异常显著更高。
High-risk triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are characterized by poor prognosis, rapid progression to metastatic stage and onset of resistance to chemotherapy, thus representing an area in need of new therapeutic approaches. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is an adaptive mechanism of tumour resistance to tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, which in turn are needed for response to chemotherapy. Overall, available data support the concept that blockade of PD-L1/programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint may improve efficacy of classical chemotherapy.
Two hundred and eighty patients with TNBC were enrolled in this multicentre study (NCT002620280) and randomized to neoadjuvant carboplatin area under the curve 2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, without (n = 142) or with (n = 138) atezolizumab 1200 mg i.v. on day 1. Both regimens were given q3 weeks for eight cycles before surgery followed by four cycles of an adjuvant anthracycline regimen. The primary aim of the study was to compare event-free survival (EFS), and an important secondary aim was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR defined as the absence of invasive cells in breast and lymph nodes). The primary population for all efficacy endpoints is the intention-to-treat (ITT) population.
The ITT analysis revealed that pCR rate after treatment with atezolizumab (48.6%) did not reach statistical significance compared to no atezolizumab [44.4%: odds ratio (OR) 1.18; 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.89; P = 0.48]. Treatment-related adverse events were similar with either regimen except for a significantly higher overall incidence of serious adverse events and liver transaminase abnormalities with atezolizumab.
The addition of atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin did not significantly increase the rate of pCR in women with TNBC. In multivariate analysis, the presence of PD-L1 expression was the most significant factor influencing the rate of pCR (OR 2.08). Continuing follow-up for the EFS is ongoing, and molecular studies are under way.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。