← 返回

直肠癌的 T2*加权成像和扩散峰度成像(DKI):与临床组织病理学预后因素的相关性

英文原题:T2*-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) of rectal cancer: correlation with clinical histopathologic prognostic factors.

查看英文原题

T2*-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) of rectal cancer: correlation with clinical histopathologic prognostic factors.

PubMed 2021/12/27(内容时间) Abdom Radiol (NY) Q2 · IF 2.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

R2*和 DKI 衍生参数与不同的组织病理学预后因素相关,可能作为直肠癌组织病理学特征的无创生物标志物。

研究思路结论见上方概要

直肠癌的组织病理学预后因素与局部复发和远处转移密切相关。我们旨在探讨T2*WI评估直肠癌临床预后因素的可行性,并与DKI进行比较。

本回顾性研究根据纳入标准,从205例直肠癌患者中纳入50例。获取以下参数:来自T2*WI的R2*,以及使用张量法从DKI获得的平均扩散率(MD k)、平均峰度(MK)和平均扩散率(MD t)。上述参数通过Mann-Whitney U检验或学生t检验进行比较。确定不同参数与组织病理学预后因素之间的Spearman相关性。分别和联合通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析R2*和DKI衍生参数的诊断性能。

R2* 与直肠癌的多个预后因素如 T 分期、N 分期、肿瘤分级、CEA 水平和 LVI 呈正相关(P < 0.004)。MD k 和 MD t 与除 CRM 和 TIL 受累外的几乎所有组织病理学预后因素呈负相关(P < 0.003)。MK 与除 CA19-9 水平和 CRM 受累外的预后因素呈正相关(P < 0.006)。用于区分预后因素的 AUC 范围,R2* 为 0.724-0.950,DKI 衍生参数为 0.755-0.913。然而,在表征直肠癌方面,T2*WI、DKI 或联合成像方法之间未发现诊断性能的显著差异。

展开英文摘要原文

Histopathologic prognostic factors of rectal cancer are closely associated with local recurrence and distant metastasis. We aim to investigate the feasibility of T2*WI in assessment of clinical prognostic factors of rectal cancer, and compare with DKI.

This retrospective study enrolled 50 out of 205 patients with rectal cancer according to the inclusion criteria. The following parameters were obtained: R2* from T2*WI, mean diffusivity (MD k ), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD t ) from DKI using tensor method. Above parameters were compared by Mann-Whitney U-test or students' t test. Spearman correlations between different parameters and histopathological prognostic factors were determined. The diagnostic performances of R2* and DKI-derived parameters were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), separately and jointly.

There were positive correlations between R2* and multiple prognostic factors of rectal cancer such as T category, N category, tumor grade, CEA level, and LVI (P < 0.004). MD k and MD t showed negative correlations with almost all the histopathological prognostic factors except CRM and TIL involvement (P < 0.003). MK correlated positively with the prognostic factors except CA19-9 level and CRM involvement (P < 0.006). The AUC ranges were 0.724-0.950 for R2* and 0.755-0.913 for DKI-derived parameters for differentiation of prognostic factors. However, no significant differences of diagnostic performance were found between T2*WI, DKI, or the combined imaging methods in characterizing rectal cancer.

R2* and DKI-derived parameters were associated with different histopathological prognostic factors, and might act as noninvasive biomarkers for histopathological characterization of rectal cancer.

论文信息

作者
Hu S、Peng Y、Wang Q、Liu B、Kamel I、Liu Z、Liang C
第一作者单位
The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.China
通讯作者单位
The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. liangchanghong@gdph.org.cn.China
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Abdominal radiology (New York)2022 Feb
原文标识
PubMed 34958406 · DOI 10.1007/s00261-021-03369-1