基于 DNA 超分子水凝胶的保护性 NK 细胞储库用于增强三阴性乳腺癌治疗
Protective NK Cell Reservoir Based on DNA Supramolecular Hydrogel for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Effector memory cytotoxic CD3(+)/CD8(+)/CD45RO(+) T cells are predictive of good survival and a lower risk of recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer.
Effector memory cytotoxic CD3(+)/CD8(+)/CD45RO(+) T cells are predictive of good survival and a lower risk of recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
高TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)的三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)与良好的预后相关。为了更好地理解免疫细胞亚型在TNBC中的预后价值,我们对TILs以及肿瘤细胞与免疫细胞亚型之间的相互作用进行了表征。共对145例乳腺癌组织进行了多重免疫荧光(mIF)染色,包括panel 1(PD-L1、PD-1、CD3、CD8、CD68和CK)和panel 2(Foxp3、Granzyme B、CD45RO、CD3、CD8和CK)。由病理学家使用InForm软件对表型进行分析和定量。
我们发现,在ER阴性(ER <1%且HER2阴性)组和ER/PR低阳性(ER 1-9%且HER2阴性)组中,分别有11.2%和7.1%的患者通过肿瘤细胞评分判定为PD-L1+,29.0%和28.6%通过改良免疫细胞评分判定为PD-L1+,30.8%和32.1%通过联合阳性评分判定为PD-L1+。
我们将ER阴性和ER/PR低阳性病例合并进行生存分析,因为临床实践中常使用10%的截断值来指导治疗。肿瘤区域中PD-L1+肿瘤细胞的密度(HR:0.366,95% CI:0.138-0.970;p = 0.043)以及总面积(肿瘤和间质区域合并)中CD3+免疫细胞的密度(HR:0.213,95% CI:0.070-0.642;p = 0.006)是TNBC总生存期(OS)的良好预后生物标志物。肿瘤区域中效应/记忆细胞毒性T细胞(CD3+CD8+CD45RO+)的密度是TNBC中OS(HR:0.232,95% CI:0.086-0.628;p = 0.004)和DFS(HR:0.183,95% CI:0.1301-0.744;p = 0.009)的独立预后生物标志物。有趣的是,空间数据表明,PD-L1+肿瘤细胞密度较高的患者,其肿瘤细胞与细胞毒性T细胞之间的细胞间距离更短(p < 0.01)。
总之,我们发现通过mIF对肿瘤免疫细胞进行表型分析,对于理解TNBC的免疫微环境具有高度信息价值。PD-L1+肿瘤细胞、总T细胞以及效应/记忆细胞毒性T细胞是TNBC中有前景的预后生物标志物。
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with high tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been associated with a promising prognosis. To better understand the prognostic value of immune cell subtypes in TNBC, we characterised TILs and the interaction between tumour cells and immune cell subtypes.
A total of 145 breast cancer tissues were stained by multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF), including panel 1 (PD-L1, PD-1, CD3, CD8, CD68 and CK) and panel 2 (Foxp3, Granzyme B, CD45RO, CD3, CD8 and CK). Phenotypes were analysed and quantified by pathologists using InForm software.
We found that in the ER-negative (ER <1% and HER2-negative) group and the ER/PR-low positive (ER 1-9% and HER2-negative) group, 11. 2% and 7. 1% of patients were PD-L1 + by the tumour cell score, 29. 0% and 28. 6% were PD-L1 + by the modified immune cell score and 30. 8% and 32. 1% were PD-L1 + by the combined positive score.
We combined ER-negative and ER/PR-low positive cases for the survival analysis since a 10% cut-off is often used in clinical practice for therapeutic purposes. The densities of PD-L1 + tumour cells (HR: 0. 366, 95% CI: 0. 138-0. 970; p = 0. 043) within the tumour compartment and CD3 + immune cells in the total area (tumour and stromal compartments combined) (HR: 0. 213, 95% CI: 0. 070-0. 642; p = 0. 006) were favourable prognostic biomarkers for overall survival (OS) in TNBC.
The density of effector/memory cytotoxic T cells (CD3 + CD8 + CD45RO + ) in the tumour compartment was an independent prognostic biomarker for OS (HR: 0. 232, 95% CI: 0. 086-0. 628; p = 0. 004) and DFS (HR: 0. 183, 95% CI: 0. 1301-0. 744; p = 0. 009) in TNBC. Interestingly, spatial data suggested that patients with a higher density of PD-L1 + tumour cells had shorter cell-cell distances from tumour cells to cytotoxic T cells (p < 0. 01).
In conclusion, we found that phenotyping tumour immune cells by mIF is highly informative in understanding the immune microenvironment in TNBC. PD-L1 + tumour cells, total T cells and effector/memory cytotoxic T cells are promising prognostic biomarkers in TNBC.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。