基于 DNA 超分子水凝胶的保护性 NK 细胞储库用于增强三阴性乳腺癌治疗
Protective NK Cell Reservoir Based on DNA Supramolecular Hydrogel for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pathological complete response and prognosis in patients with breast cancer.
Association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pathological complete response and prognosis in patients with breast cancer.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
NAC 前 TIL 水平可预测接受 NAC 的乳腺癌患者的 pCR 和 DFS。对于未达到 pCR 的患者,NAC 前 TIL 和 TIL 类别变化与 DFS 显著相关,而 NAC 后 TIL 则无显著关联。
评估乳腺癌患者在新辅助化疗(NAC)前后TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)的预测和预后价值。
对2008年8月至2019年11月期间接受NAC治疗的连续乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性分析。评估了浸润性肿瘤样本的TIL水平,高表达定义为TILs >10%。总病理完全缓解(pCR)定义为乳腺或淋巴结中无浸润性肿瘤。采用单因素和多因素分析评估与pCR率、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期相关的因素。
共纳入461例患者。pCR患者的NAC前TIL平均水平高于非pCR患者(分别为24.28% 2.34% vs. 11.34% 0.60%,p < 0.0001)。多因素分析显示,NAC前高TIL水平是更高pCR的独立危险因素(比值比 = 3.92,95% CI = 2.23-6.90,p < 0.001)。NAC前TIL水平高的患者5年DFS优于NAC前TIL水平低的患者(84.5% vs. 68.9%,HR = 0.50,95% CI = 0.31-0.81,p = 0.005)。多因素分析显示,在非pCR患者中,NAC前TIL(HR = 0.48;95% CI = 0.29-0.81,p = 0.006)而非NAC后TIL(HR = 0.89,95% CI = 0.50-1.59,p = 0.699)与DFS显著相关。此外,NAC前和NAC后TIL水平均低的患者5年DFS差于NAC前TIL水平高的患者(HR = 2.09,95% CI = 1.23-3.56,p = 0.007)。
To evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer.
Consecutive breast cancer patients treated with NAC between August 2008 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. TIL levels were evaluated of invasive tumor samples, and high expression was defined as TILs >10%. Total pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as no invasive tumor in the breast or lymph nodes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess factors associated with pCR rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival.
A total of 461 patients were included. The mean pre-NAC TIL level was higher among patients with pCR than among patients without pCR (24.28% 2.34% vs. 11.34% 0.60%, respectively, p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that a high pre-NAC TIL level was an independent risk factor for a higher pCR (odds ratio = 3.92, 95% CI = 2.23-6.90, p < 0.001). Patients with high pre-NAC TIL levels had a better 5-year DFS than those with low pre-NAC TIL levels (84.5% vs. 68.9%, HR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.31-0.81, p = 0.005). The multivariate analysis showed that pre-NAC TIL (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.29-0.81, p = 0.006) but not post-NAC TIL (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.50-1.59, p = 0.699) was significantly associated with DFS among patients without pCR. Furthermore, patients with low pre- and post-NAC TIL levels had a worse 5-year DFS than those with high pre-NAC TIL levels (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.23-3.56, p = 0.007).
Pre-NAC TIL level can predict pCR and DFS in patients with breast cancer receiving NAC. For patients without pCR, pre-NAC TIL, and TIL category change, but not post-NAC TIL, were significantly associated with DFS.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。