一种用于克服非小细胞肺癌治疗中抗原异质性的多靶向 CAR-T 细胞平台
A Multi-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Platform to Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
这些发现支持采用多靶点CAR-T 策略来应对NSCLC及可能其他实体瘤中的抗原异质性。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in locally advanced NSCLC treated with simultaneous radiochemotherapy in the randomized, multicenter, phase III German Intergroup lung Trial (GILT).
Prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in locally advanced NSCLC treated with simultaneous radiochemotherapy in the randomized, multicenter, phase III German Intergroup lung Trial (GILT).
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在这项分析中,PD-L1 表达与 RTCT 后的 PFS 不相关。
放化疗(RTCT)后接受免疫检查点抑制治疗,已成为程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)新标准治疗。然而,在这一情境下,免疫应答标志物的预后作用尚不明确。我们分析了德国肺癌协作组多中心GILT试验肿瘤活检中的PD-L1表达和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TiL)。该试验此前将Ⅲ期NSCLC患者随机分配至RTCT联合或不联合巩固化疗。
回顾性分析GILT试验患者的肿瘤活检。采用Ventana SP263检测PD-L1表达,并评估TiL评分(低、中、高)及浸润模式(排斥型、炎症型、免疫荒漠型)。生物标志物分析的主要终点是PD-L1≥1%与<1%的NSCLC患者无进展生存期(PFS);次要终点包括其他PD-L1表达水平以及TiL评分和模式的预后意义。
92名接受RTCT患者有可用活检样本,其肿瘤组织可用患者与全体研究人群在特征上无显著差异。78份样本的PD-L1评分可供分析,PD-L1<1%和≥1%亚组间PFS无差异。66名患者有TiL评分;高TiL评分患者的总生存期优于低评分患者,在接受巩固化疗者中这一趋势最明显。
本分析未发现RTCT后PD-L1表达与PFS相关。然而,TiL>10%的患者总生存期更长,尤其是RTCT结束后接受巩固化疗者。仍需进一步分析,以探究巩固性度伐利尤单抗免疫检查点抑制治疗背景下TiL的预后和预测价值。
Immune checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy (RTCT) has become a new standard of care for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, little is known about the prognostic role of immune response markers in this setting. We analysed PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in tumour biopsies from the multicenter German Intergroup Lung Trial (GILT), which previously randomised patients with stage III NSCLC to RTCT with or without consolidation chemotherapy.
We retrospectively analyzed tumour biopsies from patients treated in the GILT trial. PD-L1 expression was analysed using the Ventana SP263 assay and TiL score (low, intermediate, high) and pattern (excluded, inflamed, desert) were assessed. The primary endpoint of the biomarker analysis was PFS in patients with PD-L1 1% vs. PD-L1 < 1% NSCLC. Secondary endpoints explored the prognostic relevance of additional PD-L1 expression levels and TiL score and pattern.
Biopsies were available from 92 patients treated with RTCT. Patients with available tumor tissue did not differ significantly from the whole study population. PD-L1 scores from 78 samples were available for analysis. There was no difference in PFS in the PD-L1 < 1% vs. PD-L1 1% subgroups. TiL score was available in 66 patients. Patients with high TiL score showed favourable overall survival compared to the low TiL subgroup. This trend was most pronounced in those patients treated with consolidative chemotherapy.
In this analysis, PD-L1 expression did not correlate with PFS following RTCT. However, patients with TiLs > 10% were found to have longer overall survival, especially for those patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after the end of RTCT. Further analyses to explore the prognostic and predictive relevance of TiLs in the context of consolidative checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab are required.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。