← 返回

肿瘤学中急性肾损伤的预测:从临床风险评分到 AI 赋能的精准肿瘤肾病学

英文原题:Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Oncology: From Clinical Risk Scores to AI-Enabled Precision Onco-Nephrology.

查看英文原题

Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Oncology: From Clinical Risk Scores to AI-Enabled Precision Onco-Nephrology.

PubMed 2026/09/10(内容时间) Cancers (Basel) Q2 · IF 4.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

背景/目的:急性肾损伤(AKI)是贯穿癌症诊疗全程的常见并发症,可损害肾功能、延迟或中断抗肿瘤治疗,并恶化肾脏与肿瘤学结局。

中文摘要

我们通过2026年7月对PubMed和Google Scholar进行了迭代检索,并筛选了相关原始研究和综述的参考文献列表。我们优先纳入肿瘤学特异性模型的开发与验证研究,并在缺乏专门预测模型的情况下选择性纳入传统评分和观察性证据。

预测证据在住院癌症人群、顺铂暴露、对比增强计算机断层扫描、免疫检查点抑制剂治疗以及选定的肿瘤外科手术中最为成熟。造血干细胞移植包含一个早期传统风险评分,而CAR-T 细胞治疗和靶向治疗的证据仍以观察性为主。大多数研究为回顾性,独立外部验证、校准评估、公平性评估以及前瞻性工作流程实施仍不常见。由于结局定义、预测时间窗、人群和验证策略不同,所报告的性能无法在研究之间直接比较。

基于AI和ML的AKI预测可能支持精准肿瘤肾脏病学,但尚无肿瘤学特异性模型在前瞻性干预研究中证明可改善结局。临床进展将需要标准化结局、考虑治疗因素的纵向数据、严格的外部验证,以及与循证应答路径相关联的预测工具。这些进展最终可能通过支持在维持最佳癌症治疗的同时进行主动肾脏保护,实现精准肿瘤肾脏病学。

展开英文摘要原文

Background/Objectives: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication across the cancer care continuum and can compromise kidney function, delay or interrupt anticancer therapy, and worsen renal and oncologic outcomes.

This state-of-the-art narrative review examines conventional clinical risk scores and artificial intelligence (AI)- and machine learning (ML)-based approaches to AKI prediction in oncology and identifies priorities for clinical translation. Methods: We conducted iterative searches of PubMed and Google Scholar through July 2026 and screened reference lists of relevant primary studies and reviews.

We prioritized oncology-specific model development and validation studies and selectively included conventional scores and observational evidence where dedicated prediction models were unavailable. Results: Prediction evidence is most developed in hospitalized cancer populations, cisplatin exposure, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and selected oncologic surgical procedures. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation includes an early conventional risk score, whereas evidence for CAR T-cell therapy and targeted therapies remains predominantly observational. Most studies are retrospective, and independent external validation, calibration assessment, fairness evaluation, and prospective workflow implementation remain uncommon.

Reported performance cannot be compared directly across studies because outcome definitions, prediction windows, populations, and validation strategies differ. Conclusions: AI- and ML-based AKI prediction may support precision onco-nephrology, but no oncology-specific model has yet demonstrated improved outcomes in a prospective interventional study.

Clinical progress will require standardized outcomes, treatment-aware longitudinal data, rigorous external validation, and prediction tools linked to evidence-based response pathways. These advances may ultimately enable precision onco-nephrology by supporting proactive kidney protection while preserving optimal cancer treatment.

论文信息

作者
Sena BF、Homo A、Fahy C、Van de Putte A、Roudier B、Ugon A、Isnard Bagnis C
单位
Department of Nephrology, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France.Germany
文献类型
综述
期刊
Cancers2026 Sep 10
原文标识
PubMed 42794904 · DOI 10.3390/cancers18182937