← 返回

CAR-T 细胞生产工艺的碳足迹

英文原题:The carbon footprint of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T cell manufacturing processes.

查看英文原题

The carbon footprint of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T cell manufacturing processes.

PubMed 2026/08/28(内容时间) Int J Pharm X Q1 · IF 7.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法是血液系统恶性肿瘤的成熟治疗手段,但其生产与给药过程的环境影响仍未被探索。随着医疗系统力求减少其碳足迹,了解CAR-T 细胞生产的气候影响至关重要。

本研究的目的是量化CAR-T 细胞生产的碳足迹(以CO2当量(CO2e)表示),并识别对CO2排放贡献最大的工艺步骤。依据ISO14044:2006标准,开展了一项系统性的生命周期评估(LCA),比较集中化与床旁(PoC)CAR-T 细胞生产工艺。评估了所有主要流程,包括白细胞单采、冷冻保存、运输、生产、背景设施、质量控制及输注。排放量采用openLCA和开放获取数据库进行计算。运输是总排放的主要贡献因素,这解释了集中化生产的CAR-T 细胞(355.75 kg CO2e)相比PoC CAR-T 细胞(72.85 kg CO2e)具有更高碳足迹的原因。

此外,开放系统背景设施排放的CO2显著多于封闭系统背景设施(85.16 vs. 25.00 kg CO2e)。缩短运输距离和优化洁净室使用具有最大的减排潜力。

本研究首次评估了两种成熟CAR-T 细胞生产平台在碳足迹方面的差异,并提供了一个可广泛应用于各类CAR-T 产品的框架。它强调运输和洁净室能源使用是排放的关键驱动因素,使得 PoC 制造通过限制长距离运输大幅降低环境影响。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is an established treatment for haematological malignancies, yet the environmental impact of its manufacturing and administration remains unexplored. As healthcare systems aim to reduce their carbon footprint, understanding the climate impact of CAR-T cell manufacturing is essential. The objective of this study was to quantify the carbon footprint, expressed in CO 2 -equivalents (CO 2 e), of CAR-T cell manufacturing and identify process steps that contribute most to CO 2 -emissions.

A systematic life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing centralized and point-of-care (PoC) CAR-T cell manufacturing processes was conducted, according to ISO14044:2006 standards. All major processes were assessed, including leukapheresis, cryopreservation, transport, manufacturing, background facilities, quality controls, and infusion.

Emissions were calculated using openLCA and open-access databases. Transport was the dominant contributor to total emissions, accounting for the higher footprint of centralized manufactured CAR-T cells (355. 75 kg CO 2 e) compared to PoC CAR-T cells (72. 85 kg CO 2 e).

In addition, open system background facilities emitted substantially more CO 2 compared to closed system background facilities (85. 16 vs. 25. 00 kg CO 2 e). Reducing travel distance and optimizing cleanroom use offer the greatest potential for emission reduction.

This study provides the first assessment of differences in the carbon footprint of two established CAR-T cell manufacturing platforms and offers a framework that can be applied across a broad range of CAR-T products. It highlights transport and cleanroom energy use as key drivers of emissions, causing PoC manufacturing to substantially reduce the environmental impact by limiting long-distance transport.

论文信息

作者
van der Bijl WE、Gareb B、Klomberg KM、Bremer E、van Meerten T、Oude Munnink TH、Dekkers BGJ
单位
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Netherlands
期刊
International journal of pharmaceutics: X2026 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 42730229 · DOI 10.1016/j.ijpx.2026.100654