γδ T 细胞调节小细胞肺癌中的抗肿瘤免疫
γδ T cells modulate anti-tumor immunity in small cell lung cancer.
我们的发现表明,活化的γδ T细胞可能是SCLC治疗的有价值靶点。
英文原题:Association Between Kita-Kyushu Lung Cancer Antigen-1 Positivity and Pathological High-grade Lung Adenocarcinoma.
KK-LC-1阳性与肺腺癌患者的病理高级别肿瘤和不良RFS显著相关。此外,KK-LC-1可能作为肺腺癌的预后因素,KK-LC-1阳性患者可能是TCR重建治疗的合适候选者。
北九州肺癌抗原-1(KK-LC-1)是一种癌症-睾丸抗原,是T细胞受体(TCR)基因工程T细胞治疗的一个有前景的靶点。本研究旨在评估KK-LC-1免疫组化检测在切除的肺腺癌标本中的实用性。
我们回顾了110例接受根治性切除术的肺腺癌患者的病历。本研究评估了针对KK-LC-1的原始单克隆抗体Kmab34B3。根据KK-LC-1阳性和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态,比较了总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。采用Cox回归分析以确定预后因素。
39例患者(35%)KK-LC-1阳性。KK-LC-1阳性与较大的浸润性肿瘤尺寸、较晚的病理分期、淋巴管侵犯、血管侵犯和淋巴结转移显著相关。KK-LC-1阳性与阴性患者之间未观察到OS的显著差异(5年OS:79.8% vs 94.0%,p=0.07)。然而,KK-LC-1阳性患者的RFS显著差于KK-LC-1阴性患者(5年RFS:67.7% vs 85.5%,p=0.020)。在多变量分析中,KK-LC-1阳性并非RFS的独立预测因子(风险比=1.230,p=0.63)。89例患者可进行EGFR突变分析,其中45例(50.5%)携带EGFR突变。在EGFR突变阳性亚组中,KK-LC-1阳性患者的OS显著差于KK-LC-1阴性患者(5年OS:77.0% vs 100%,p=0.026)。KK-LC-1阳性患者的RFS也倾向于更差,尽管差异未达到统计学显著性(5年RFS:66.6% vs 88.4%,p=0.055)。
BACKGROUND/AIM: Kita-Kyushu Lung Cancer antigen-1 (KK-LC-1) is a cancer-testis antigen that represents a promising target for treatment with T-cell receptor (TCR) gene-engineered T cells. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of immunohistochemical detection of KK-LC-1 in resected lung adenocarcinoma specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 110 patients who underwent curative resection for lung adenocarcinoma. The original monoclonal antibody against KK-LC-1, Kmab34B3, was evaluated in this study. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared based on KK-LC-1 positivity and epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutation. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (35%) were positive for KK-LC-1. KK-LC-1 positivity was significantly associated with larger invasive tumor size, advanced pathological stage, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis. No significant difference in OS was observed between KK-LC-1-positive and -negative patients (5-year OS: 79.8% vs . 94.0%, p =0.07). However, KK-LC-1-positive patients had significantly poorer RFS than KK-LC-1-negative patients (5-year RFS: 67.7% vs . 85.5%, p =0.020). In multivariate analysis, KK-LC-1 positivity was not an independent predictor of RFS (hazard ratio=1.230, p =0.63). EGFR mutation analysis was available for 89 patients, of whom 45 (50.5%) harbored EGFR mutations. In the EGFR mutation-positive subgroup, KK-LC-1-positive patients had significantly poorer OS than KK-LC-1-negative patients (5-year OS: 77.0% vs . 100%, p =0.026). RFS also tended to be poorer in KK-LC-1-positive patients, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (5-year RFS: 66.6% vs . 88.4%, p =0.055). CONCLUSION: KK-LC-1 positivity was significantly associated with pathological high-grade tumors and poor RFS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Moreover, KK-LC-1 may serve as a prognostic factor for lung adenocarcinoma, and KK-LC-1-positive patients may be suitable candidates for TCR reconstitution therapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。