CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients treated with commercial chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients treated with commercial chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
这项真实世界研究为商业化 CAR-T 疗法的决策增添了新的证据,并支持制定临床最佳实践和指南、支付方决策以及 RRMM 中 CAR-T 治疗的卫生系统规划。
描述复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者中医生报告的CAR-T 细胞治疗处方模式及转诊路径,并描述接受商业化西达基奥仑赛(cilta-cel)治疗患者的治疗模式及临床结局。
本研究包括一项描述性医生调查和回顾性病历审查。代表地理分布多样的私立社区诊所(82.4%)和学术中心(17.6%)的17名医生完成了一份标准化问卷,内容涉及CAR-T 转诊模式和感知到的障碍。提取了72例RRMM成人患者的病历,这些患者在2022年2月28日至2024年6月30日期间、在美国食品药品监督管理局批准后接受了cilta-cel治疗,以评估治疗路径和临床结局;未采集安全性数据。
医生报告在过去一年中治疗了289名符合CAR-T 治疗条件的患者;52.9%的医生表示有31%-50%的符合条件患者未被转诊。对于已转诊的患者,治疗疗效(76.5%)和良好体能状态/低虚弱程度(64.7%)是转诊的首要原因,而患者选择(52.9%)、体能状态差/高虚弱程度(47.1%)、合并症负担(41.2%)和高龄(41.2%)是未转诊的主要原因。在72名接受cilta-cel治疗的患者中,约一半(55.6%)需前往超过30英里以外的治疗中心,27.8%因治疗而搬迁。在进行缓解评估的患者中,总缓解率为95.2%,60.3%至少达到完全缓解。在随访结束时(中位随访时间:5.6个月),86.1%的患者存活,其中43.5%达到缓解且未接受积极治疗。
To characterize physician-reported prescribing patterns and referral pathways for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and to describe treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients receiving commercial ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel).
This study comprised a descriptive physician survey and retrospective medical chart review. Seventeen physicians representing geographically diverse private community practices (82.4%) and academic centers (17.6%) completed a standardized questionnaire addressing CAR-T referral patterns and perceived barriers. Medical records of 72 adult patients with RRMM who received cilta-cel between February 28, 2022, and June 30, 2024, following US Food and Drug Administration approval, were abstracted to evaluate treatment pathways and clinical outcomes; safety data were not captured.
Physicians reported treating 289 patients who were eligible for CAR-T therapy in the past year; 52.9% indicated that 31%-50% of eligible patients were not referred. For referred patients, efficacy of therapy (76.5%) and good performance status/low frailty (64.7%) were top reasons for referral, whereas patient choice (52.9%), poor performance status/high frailty (47.1%), comorbidity burden (41.2%), and older age (41.2%) were primary reasons for nonreferral. Among the 72 patients who received cilta-cel, approximately half (55.6%) traveled >30 miles to treatment centers, and 27.8% relocated for treatment. In those with a response assessment, the overall response rate was 95.2% and 60.3% achieved at least a complete response. At the end of follow-up (median: 5.6 months), 86.1% were alive, of whom 43.5% achieved remission and were not receiving active treatment.
This real-world study adds to the body of evidence on decision-making for use of commercial CAR-T therapies and supports the development of clinical best practices and guidelines, payer decisions, and health system planning for CAR-T treatment in RRMM.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。