CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Cancer center leadership during large-scale crises: a practical evidence-informed framework with perspectives from the Gulf Cooperation Council.
Cancer center leadership during large-scale crises: a practical evidence-informed framework with perspectives from the Gulf Cooperation Council.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
癌症中心在大规模危机中格外脆弱——包括大流行、武装冲突、网络攻击和供应链中断——尽管COVID-19为肿瘤学提供了宝贵的危机指导,但针对GCC癌症系统特定结构性脆弱性的定制框架仍然有限。海湾合作委员会地区以紧迫的实时紧迫性凸显了这一差距。据报道,正在进行的2026年地区军事升级已扰乱霍尔木兹海峡航运和海湾航空货运路线——这是所有六个GCC国家药品冷链物流的关键通道——对基本肿瘤药物、核医学用放射性同位素以及CAR-T 制造供应链构成风险。预计到2040年,GCC地区的癌症发病率将增加60%,而全球范围内癌症照护仍未被充分纳入应急准备框架。本Perspective提出一个面向癌症中心主任和肿瘤学领导者的六支柱危机领导框架,按照四阶段危机生命周期(准备、响应、适应、恢复)组织,借鉴大流行时期的肿瘤学证据、国际肿瘤学会指南以及对2026年GCC危机的背景分析。这六个支柱涵盖癌症中心危机管理的完整运营范围,从分诊和药品韧性到劳动力福祉、数字健康和跨境协调。提出了针对GCC卫生系统的三项具体政策建议:建立一个正式的GCC肿瘤学危机网络,配备区域实时药品仪表板和覆盖阿联酋、沙特阿拉伯和阿曼的分布式储备框架;对肿瘤学基本物资进行国内制造投资;以及制定GCC肿瘤学韧性研究议程。
Cancer centers are disproportionately vulnerable to large-scale crises-including pandemics, armed conflicts, cyberattacks, and supply chain failures-and while COVID-19 generated valuable crisis guidance for oncology, frameworks tailored to the specific structural vulnerabilities of GCC cancer systems have been limited. The Gulf Cooperation Council region illustrates this gap with immediate, real-time urgency. The ongoing 2026 regional military escalation has reportedly disrupted Strait of Hormuz shipping and Gulf air cargo routes-critical corridors for pharmaceutical cold-chain logistics across all six GCC states-posing risks to essential oncology pharmaceuticals, radioisotopes used in nuclear medicine, and CAR-T manufacturing supply chains. Cancer incidence across the GCC is projected to increase by 60% by 2040, and cancer care remains under-integrated into emergency preparedness frameworks globally.
This Perspective proposes a six-pillar crisis leadership framework for cancer center directors and oncology leaders, organized across a four-phase crisis lifecycle (Prepare, Respond, Adapt, Recover), drawing on pandemic-era oncology evidence, international oncology society guidelines, and contextual analysis of the 2026 GCC crisis. The six pillars address the full operational spectrum of cancer center crisis management, from triage and pharmaceutical resilience to workforce wellbeing, digital health, and cross-border coordination.
Three specific policy recommendations for GCC health systems are proposed: a formal GCC Oncology Crisis Network with a Regional Real-Time Pharmaceutical Dashboard and distributed reserve framework spanning UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Oman; domestic manufacturing investment for oncology essentials; and a GCC oncology resilience research agenda.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。