CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Research trends and hotspots of CAR-T cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A bibliometric analysis.
Research trends and hotspots of CAR-T cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A bibliometric analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
本研究旨在通过文献计量学分析,分析CAR-T 细胞治疗ALL的全球研究模式和新趋势。从Web of Science核心合集数据库检索相关文献。文献计量分析使用VOSviewer、CiteSpace和R包“bibliometrix”来可视化合作、关键词共现和新出现的研究趋势。共分析了来自44个国家的6,459位作者在253种期刊上发表的844篇文章,年增长率为40.08%。美国(372篇文章,38,065次引用)和中国(275篇文章,5,636次引用)在研究产出中占主导地位。宾夕法尼亚大学(353篇文章)、纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(170篇)和费城儿童医院(131篇)是最高产的机构,而Blood(41篇文章)发表的文章最多。
Stephan A. Grupp(38篇文章,H指数 = 30)、Carl H. June(26篇文章,H指数 = 24)和Shannon L. Maude(25篇文章,H指数 = 20)是最有影响力的作者。关键词分析揭示了五个研究聚类,包括基本机制、CAR设计、人群治疗整合、临床结局和毒性管理。突现关键词分析显示,研究从基础科学(2010-2013)演变到临床转化(2014-2016)、毒性管理(2017-2019),最近又转向长期结局和风险评估(2020-2024),其中“term follow-up”和“risk”是2024年唯一具有活跃突现的关键词。该文献计量学分析揭示,CAR-T 治疗ALL的研究已从基础概念进展到临床实施,目前聚焦于优化长期结局和患者选择。未来研究应优先关注生物标志物开发、下一代CAR设计和联合策略,以克服ALL治疗中的持久性、毒性和耐药性局限。
This study aims to analyze the global research patterns and emerging trends in CAR-T cell therapy for ALL through a bibliometric analysis. Publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The bibliometric analysis utilized VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package "bibliometrix" to visualize collaborations, keyword co-occurrences, and emerging research trends. A total of 844 articles from 253 journals by 6,459 authors across 44 countries were analyzed, showing an annual growth rate of 40. 08%. The USA (372 articles, 38,065 citations) and China (275 articles, 5,636 citations) dominated research output. The University of Pennsylvania (353 articles), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (170), and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (131) were the most productive institutions, while Blood (41 articles) published the most articles. Stephan A. Grupp (38 articles, H-index = 30), Carl H. June (26 articles, H-index = 24), and Shannon L.
Maude (25 articles, H-index = 20) were the most influential authors. Keyword analysis revealed five research clusters, including basic mechanisms, CAR design, population treatment integration, clinical outcomes, and toxicity management. Burst keyword analysis showed the evolution from basic science (2010-2013) to clinical translation (2014-2016), toxicity management (2017-2019), and recently to long-term outcomes and risk assessment (2020-2024), with "term follow-up" and "risk" as the only keywords with active bursts in 2024.
This bibliometric analysis reveals that research on CAR-T therapy for ALL has progressed from foundational concepts to clinical implementation and now focuses on optimizing long-term outcomes and patient selection. Future research should prioritize biomarker development, next-generation CAR designs, and combination strategies to overcome persistence, toxicity, and resistance limitations in ALL treatment.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。