CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Metabolic and functional analysis including repetitive antigen stimulation provides a more accurate assessment for CAR-T cell product quality and long-term functionality.
Metabolic and functional analysis including repetitive antigen stimulation provides a more accurate assessment for CAR-T cell product quality and long-term functionality.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
BCMA 靶向 CAR-T 细胞疗法在多发性骨髓瘤中已展现出显著的临床疗效,但用于评估产品质量和预测长期功能性的可靠方法仍不完善。尽管白细胞单采产物的免疫表型特征与临床结局相关,但输注用 CAR-T 细胞产物的表征仍具挑战性,且各研究之间不一致。
我们比较了两种版本的学术型BCMA-CAR产品CARTemis-1,二者仅共刺激结构域不同(4-1BB vs. CD28),并在抗原刺激前后进行了详细的功能与分子表征,以确定哪些分析方法最能捕捉CAR-T 细胞产品之间具有功能相关性的差异。分析包括常规流式细胞术、短期细胞毒性试验、重复抗原刺激、代谢谱分析和转录组学评估。最后,还分析了患者来源的CAR-T 细胞产品(n = 15)的代谢谱。
尽管既往研究已报道了整合不同共刺激结构域的 CAR-T 细胞产品之间存在功能差异,但我们体系中的常规检测未能在活力、扩增动力学、免疫表型或活化/耗竭标志物表达方面揭示出显著差异。相比之下,对功能要求更高的检测则揭示出各构建体之间存在明显差异。重复抗原刺激显示 CARTemis-1-BB 具有更优的长期细胞毒性,而代谢谱分析则表明其在抗原暴露后具有增强的备用呼吸能力和最大呼吸能力。转录组分析进一步显示出不同的通路调控,CARTemis-1-BB 中富集 T 细胞活化特征,而 CARTemis-1-28 中富集 Wnt/TGF 相关反应。重要的是,对输注的 CAR-T 细胞产品进行代谢谱分析还识别出与临床结局相关的不同特征,可将输注给长期缓解患者的产品与输注给短期缓解或未缓解患者的产品区分开来。
持久性和代谢分析是临床前开发过程中优化CAR-T 细胞构建体选择的关键工具,相比标准免疫表型分析,能更准确地评估CAR-T 细胞产品质量,并有助于识别具有更优治疗潜力的构建体。
BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy in multiple myeloma, but robust methods to evaluate product quality and predict long-term functionality remain underdeveloped. While immunophenotypic features of leukapheresis products correlate with clinical outcomes, the characterization of infused CAR-T cell products remains challenging and inconsistent across studies.
We compared two versions of our academic BCMA-CAR product, CARTemis-1, differing only in their costimulatory domains (4-1BB vs. CD28), and performed a detailed functional and molecular characterization before and after antigen stimulation to identify which analytical approaches best capture functionally relevant differences between CAR-T cell products. Analyses included conventional flow cytometry, short-term cytotoxicity assays, repetitive antigen stimulation, metabolic profiling, and transcriptomic evaluation. Finally, metabolic profile of patient derived CAR-T cells products (n = 15) was also analyzed.
Although previous studies have reported functional differences between CAR-T cell products incorporating distinct costimulatory domains, conventional assays in our system revealed no significant differences in viability, expansion dynamics, immunophenotype, or activation/exhaustion marker expression. In contrast, more functionally demanding assays revealed clear differences between constructs. Repetitive antigen stimulation revealed superior long-term cytotoxicity in CARTemis-1-BB, while metabolic profiling demonstrated enhanced spare respiratory capacity and maximal respiration after antigen exposure. Transcriptomic analysis further showed distinct pathway regulation, with enrichment of T cell activation signatures in CARTemis-1-BB and Wnt/TGF -related responses in CARTemis-1-28. Importantly, metabolic profiling of infused CAR-T cell products also identified distinct signatures associated with clinical outcome, distinguishing products administered to long-term responders from those infused into short-term or non-responding patients.
Persistence and metabolic analyses represent key tools for optimizing CAR-T cell construct selection during preclinical development, providing a more accurate assessment of CAR-T cell product quality than standard immunophenotyping and enabling the identification of constructs with superior therapeutic potential.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。