← 返回

实体瘤中的细胞因子释放综合征:基于机制的治疗策略用于预防和管理

英文原题:Cytokine release syndrome in solid tumours: mechanism-based therapeutic strategies for prevention and management.

查看英文原题

Cytokine release syndrome in solid tumours: mechanism-based therapeutic strategies for prevention and management.

PubMed 2026/06/14(内容时间) Ther Adv Med Oncol Q2 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)代表由T细胞快速参与所启动、并通过固有免疫细胞(尤其是单核细胞和巨噬细胞)放大的一系列免疫过度激活,下游细胞因子级联驱动内皮功能障碍、毛细血管渗漏和器官损伤。CRS是T细胞衔接类免疫治疗常见的、与类别相关的毒性,随着T细胞重定向治疗在实体瘤中推进临床开发,其发生率正日益增高。尽管与血液系统恶性肿瘤患者相比,实体瘤患者的CRS通常较轻,但这些新兴药物的II-III期试验一致报告大多数患者出现1-2级CRS,凸显了在保留主要治疗抗肿瘤活性的同时,需要有效的预防和管理策略。当前的分级和管理算法在很大程度上外推自CAR-T 细胞治疗的经验,依赖于逐步递增给药、预处理用药、支持治疗以及升级至白细胞介素(IL)-6/IL-6R阻断和糖皮质激素。

然而,激素难治性或高级别CRS,以及重叠综合征,凸显了该方法的局限性,以及需要针对上游介质和信号枢纽的基于机制的干预措施。这些包括IL-1阻断、Janus激酶-信号转导和转录激活因子抑制、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子中和、肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制和干扰素γ阻断。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们综合了支持实体瘤中CRS预防和管理的机制学依据及新兴临床证据,特别关注T细胞衔接器(TCE)及其他T细胞重定向疗法。随后,我们概述了关键的风险缓解策略,并讨论了这些策略对抗肿瘤免疫的潜在影响。

最后,我们指出了关键的知识空白,特别是缺乏前瞻性实体瘤特异性数据,因此当前的CRS预防和管理策略在很大程度上仍是从血液系统恶性肿瘤中外推而来,同时还需要生物标志物驱动的风险分层、最佳序贯和预防策略以及下一代TCE设计的开发。

展开英文摘要原文

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) represents a spectrum of immune hyperactivation initiated by rapid T-cell engagement and amplified through innate immune cells, particularly monocytes and macrophages, with downstream cytokine cascades driving endothelial dysfunction, capillary leak and organ impairment. CRS is a frequent, class-associated toxicity of T-cell-engaging immunotherapies and is being observed with increasing regularity as T-cell-redirecting therapies progress through clinical development in solid tumours.

Although CRS is typically less severe in patients with solid tumours relative to those with haematological malignancies, phase II-III trials of these emerging agents consistently report grade 1-2 CRS in the majority of patients, highlighting the need for effective prevention and management strategies, while preserving anti-tumour activity of the primary therapy.

Current grading and management algorithms have been largely extrapolated from experience with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and rely on step-up dosing, premedication, supportive care and escalation to interleukin (IL)-6/IL-6R blockade and corticosteroids.

However, steroid-refractory or high-grade CRS, as well as overlapping syndromes underscore the limitations of this approach and the need for mechanism-based interventions targeting upstream mediators and signalling hubs. These include IL-1 blockade, Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription inhibition, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor neutralisation, tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibition and interferon gamma blockade.

In this narrative review, we synthesise the mechanistic rationale and emerging clinical evidence underpinning CRS prevention and management in solid tumours, with a particular focus on T-cell engager (TCE) and other T-cell-redirecting therapies.

We then outline key risk-mitigation strategies and discuss their potential implications for anti-tumour immunity.

Finally, we highlight key knowledge gaps, particularly the paucity of prospective solid tumour-specific data, with current CRS prevention and management strategies therefore remaining largely extrapolated from haematological malignancies, alongside the need for biomarker-driven risk stratification, optimal sequencing and prophylactic strategies and the development of next-generation TCE designs.

论文信息

作者
Monaca F、Woodford R、Joshi K、Thistlethwaite F、Lim KHJ、Gomez-Randulfe I
第一作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.United Kingdom
通讯作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.United Kingdom
文献类型
综述
期刊
Therapeutic advances in medical oncology2026
原文标识
PubMed 42306495 · DOI 10.1177/17588359261457552