CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes of patients with true extramedullary multiple myeloma: a real-world monocentric analysis.
Characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes of patients with true extramedullary multiple myeloma: a real-world monocentric analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
尽管多发性骨髓瘤(MM)治疗取得显著进展,髓外病变(EMD)仍是侵袭性亚型,预后较差,管理尚无共识,专门临床试验也很少。
我们回顾性分析单中心86例影像学确诊EMD患者(软组织受累且与骨不连续;数据截止2024年9月30日)。队列包括新发EMD 19例(22%)和MM复发时继发EMD 67例(78%)。评估临床特征、生存结局及治疗策略。治疗高度异质,涉及50余种不同方案。自初次MM诊断起的总生存期中位数(mOS)为55个月。自EMD发生起,新发及继发EMD患者mOS分别为28个月和21个月。生存结局因解剖部位而异:中枢神经系统、肺和腹膜后受累呈生存较差趋势;探索性分析中,淋巴结受累与显著较长生存相关(p=0.011)。基于这些发现,我们探索性地将解剖部位划分为三级风险组,呈现逐级变化趋势,但未达到统计学显著性(p=0.054)。新发EMD和继发EMD患者中,高危细胞遗传学特征比例分别为50%和43%。CAR-T 细胞疗法和双特异性抗体等新型药物主要用于后线治疗,继发EMD患者的应答常为短暂应答。本真实世界分析证实EMD具有高危特征,尤其是中枢神经系统、肺或腹膜后受累患者。鉴于治疗差异显著,亟需前瞻性登记研究以确定最佳治疗排序,并应对EMD患者未满足的重大治疗需求。
Despite substantial therapeutic advances in multiple myeloma (MM), extramedullary disease (EMD) remains an aggressive subtype associated with poor prognosis, for which consensus on management is lacking and dedicated clinical trials are scarce.
We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of 86 patients with radiologically confirmed EMD, defined as soft-tissue involvement without bone contiguity (data cut-off September 30, 2024). The cohort included patients with de novo EMD (n = 19, 22%) and secondary EMD at relapse of MM (n = 67, 78%).
We assessed clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and treatment strategies. Treatment was highly heterogeneous, comprising > 50 distinct regimens. Median overall survival (mOS) from initial MM diagnosis was 55 months. mOS from EMD occurrence was 28 months for de novo and 21 months for secondary EMD. Survival varied by anatomical site: central nervous system (CNS), pulmonary, and retroperitoneal involvement showed a trend toward inferior survival, whereas lymph node involvement was associated with significantly longer survival in exploratory analyses (p = 0. 011). Based on these findings, we exploratorily categorized anatomical sites into a three-tiered risk grouping, which revealed a stepwise gradient that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.
054). High-risk cytogenetic features were present in 50% of patients with de novo EMD and in 43% with secondary EMD. Novel agents, including CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, were used predominantly in later lines, with responses in secondary EMD that were often transient.
This real-world analysis confirms the high-risk nature of EMD, especially for patients with CNS, pulmonary, or retroperitoneal involvement. Given the observed treatment heterogeneity, prospective registries are urgently needed to define optimal therapeutic sequencing and address the high unmet therapeutic need in EMD patients.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。