RNF43 p.G659fs 通过 PI3K/AKT/mTOR 信号通路和 HLA-E 上调导致 MSI-high 结直肠癌中 NK 细胞功能障碍
RNF43 p.G659fs leads to natural killer cell dysfunction in MSI-high colorectal cancer through PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling and HLA-E up-regulation.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Block, clear, and boost: a novel therapeutic framework for targeting intercellular mitochondrial transfer in Cancer immunotherapy.
Block, clear, and boost: a novel therapeutic framework for targeting intercellular mitochondrial transfer in Cancer immunotherapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
细胞间线粒体转移(IMT)正逐渐成为肿瘤微环境的关键调控因素,重塑肿瘤-免疫界面的生物能量学、信号传导和治疗反应性。线粒体物质可通过多种途径在肿瘤微环境(TME)内交换,包括隧道纳米管(TNTs)、细胞外囊泡(EVs)、间隙连接相关交换以及细胞-细胞融合。这种交换的结果在很大程度上取决于所转移线粒体物质的质量:递送代谢功能健全的线粒体可能恢复T细胞的氧化磷酸化和效应功能,而转移受损的线粒体货物则可能放大氧化应激并促进终末功能障碍。线粒体质量控制机制,包括PINK1-Parkin通路和USP30调控的去泛素化,可能关键性地影响受体细胞如何处理转移的线粒体物质。除适应性免疫外,IMT还涉及固有免疫区室,包括巨噬细胞、NK 细胞和树突状细胞。更广泛地说,癌细胞可以从非恶性伙伴获取线粒体支持,包括神经元、脂肪来源干细胞和内皮细胞,从而在特定情境下增强代谢灵活性、耐药性和转移潜能。基于这些机制,本综述提出“阻断、清除与增强”作为假设生成框架,以组织未来关于癌症免疫治疗中IMT调控的研究。这三个概念分支分别指阻断有害转移、清除受损线粒体货物,以及通过代谢增强或工程化线粒体捐赠来增强免疫细胞。
重要的是,该框架尚未经过临床验证,其治疗相关性仍有待在途径特异性、细胞类型特异性和前瞻性设计的研究中进行检验。为支持未来的转化开发,我们讨论了用于患者分层的候选生物标志物,包括宿主mtDNA单倍群、体细胞肿瘤特征(例如线粒体通路特征,MitoPS)以及循环IMT替代指标。
最后,我们概述了在现有免疫疗法(包括免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和过继细胞疗法(ACTs))之外评估IMT调控所面临的挑战和未来方向。
Intercellular mitochondrial transfer (IMT) is emerging as a critical regulator of the tumor microenvironment, reshaping bioenergetics, signaling, and therapeutic responsiveness across the tumor-immune interface. Mitochondrial material can be exchanged within the tumor microenvironment (TME) through multiple routes, including tunneling nanotubes (TNTs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), gap junction-associated exchange, and cell-cell fusion. The outcome of this exchange depends strongly on the quality of the transferred mitochondrial material: delivery of metabolically competent mitochondria may restore oxidative phosphorylation and effector function in T cells, whereas transfer of damaged mitochondrial cargo may amplify oxidative stress and promote terminal dysfunction. Mitochondrial quality-control mechanisms, including the PINK1-Parkin pathway and USP30-regulated deubiquitination, may critically influence how recipient cells process transferred mitochondrial material.
Beyond adaptive immunity, IMT has also been implicated in innate immune compartments, including macrophages, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells. More broadly, cancer cells can acquire mitochondrial support from non-malignant partners, including neurons, adipose-derived stem cells, and endothelial cells, thereby enhancing metabolic flexibility, drug resistance, and metastatic potential in selected contexts.
Based on these mechanisms, this review proposes "Block, Clear, and Boost" as a hypothesis-generating framework for organizing future studies of IMT modulation in cancer immunotherapy. The three conceptual arms refer to blocking harmful transfer, clearing damaged mitochondrial cargo, and boosting immune cells through metabolic augmentation or engineered mitochondrial donation.
Importantly, this framework has not been clinically validated, and its therapeutic relevance remains to be tested in route-specific, cell-type-specific, and prospectively designed studies. To support future translational development, we discuss candidate biomarkers for patient stratification, including host mtDNA haplogroups, somatic tumor signatures (e. g. , Mitochondrial Pathway Signature, MitoPS), and circulating IMT proxies.
Finally, we outline challenges and future directions for evaluating IMT modulation alongside existing immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and adoptive cell therapies (ACTs).
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。