← 返回前沿论文

ASTCT 毒性分级系统对成熟 B 细胞恶性肿瘤 CAR-T 治疗后结局的影响

英文原题:Impact of ASTCT Toxicity Grading System on Outcomes After CAR-T for Mature B-Cell Malignancies.

查看英文原题

Impact of ASTCT Toxicity Grading System on Outcomes After CAR-T for Mature B-Cell Malignancies.

PubMed 2026/05/23(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

美国移植与细胞治疗学会(ASTCT)共识分级系统统一了嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗后细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的分类。

然而,CRS、ICANS以及免疫效应细胞相关血液学毒性(ICAHT)的预后意义仍未充分明确。这项多中心回顾性研究纳入2016至2024年间在3家学术中心接受CD19靶向CAR-T 治疗的成年成熟B细胞恶性肿瘤患者。CRS和ICANS依据ASTCT标准分级,早期ICAHT依据EHA/EBMT共识定义分级。主要终点为非复发死亡率(NRM);次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用第30天里程碑分析和按中心分层的多变量模型评估结局,并校正临床相关协变量;另在全队列中自第0天起将CRS作为时间依赖协变量分析NRM,进行补充敏感性分析。560例患者中,最常使用axi-cel(48%),其次为tisa-cel(25%)、liso-cel(23%)和brexu-cel(4%)。中位随访23.9个月时,全队列2年NRM累积发生率为7.2%,2年OS和PFS分别为57%和41%。

总体而言,140例(25%)发生2级CRS,61例(11%)发生3至4级CRS;40例(7%)发生2级ICANS,74例(13%)发生3至4级ICANS;151例(30%)发生2级早期ICAHT,144例(29%)发生3至4级早期ICAHT。在校正基线协变量的第+30天里程碑分析中,CRS和早期ICAHT严重程度与NRM、OS或PFS均无独立关联。相比之下,3级ICANS与NRM增加(HR=2.46,95% CI 1.00–6.04)和OS较差(HR=1.79,95% CI 1.14–2.81)独立相关,但与PFS无关。敏感性分析中,3至4级CRS在单变量分析中与NRM相关,但在多变量分析中不再相关。在这一真实世界CD19 CAR-T 治疗队列中,高级别ICANS对第30天后的结局仍具有独立预后意义,而CRS和早期ICAHT则没有;但严重CRS仍可能促成早期治疗相关死亡。这些发现支持现代分级系统用于解释临床结局,并强调神经毒性是CD19 CAR-T 治疗后预防干预的重点。

展开英文摘要原文

The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) consensus grading system standardized the classification of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

However, the prognostic relevance of CRS and ICANS, as well as immune effector cell-associated hematological toxicity (ICAHT), remains incompletely defined. In this multicenter retrospective study, adult patients with mature B-cell malignancies treated with CD19-directed CAR-T therapy between 2016 and 2024 at three academic centers were included. CRS and ICANS were graded according to ASTCT criteria, and early ICAHT according to EHA/EBMT consensus definitions. The primary endpoint was non-relapse mortality (NRM); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Outcomes were evaluated using day 30 landmark analyses with multivariable models stratified by center and adjusted for clinically relevant covariates; a complementary sensitivity analysis modeled CRS as a time-dependent covariate for NRM in the full cohort from day 0.

Among 560 patients, axi-cel was the most frequently used product (48%), followed by tisa-cel (25%), liso-cel (23%) and brexu-cel (4%). With a median follow-up of 23. 9 months, the 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM for the full cohort was 7. 2%, with 2-year OS and PFS of 57% and 41%, respectively.

Overall, 140 patients (25%) and 61 (11%) developed grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 CRS, respectively; 40 (7%) and 74 (13%) developed grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 ICANS, respectively; and 151 (30%) and 144 (29%) developed grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 early ICAHT, respectively. In a day +30 landmark analysis adjusted for baseline covariates, CRS and early ICAHT severity was not independently associated with NRM, OS, or PFS. In contrast, grade 3 ICANS was independently associated with increased NRM (HR: 2.

46, 95% CI, 1. 00 to 6. 04) and inferior OS (HR: 1. 79, 95% CI, 1. 14 to 2. 81), but not with PFS. In the sensitivity analysis, grade 3 to 4 CRS was associated with NRM in univariable but not in multivariable analysis. In this real-world cohort of patients treated with CD19 CAR-T cells, we found that high grade ICANS retained independent prognostic significance for outcomes beyond day 30, whereas CRS and early ICAHT did not; however, severe CRS may still contribute to early treatment-related mortality.

These findings support the clinical utility of modern grading systems for outcome interpretation and emphasize neurotoxicity as a priority for preventive interventions after CD19 CAR-T therapy.

论文信息

作者
Gomez-Llobell M、Escribano Serrat S、Bromberg M、Seshan V、Devlin S、Einarsdottir S、Ben Valid O、Golan-Aceb N
第一作者单位
Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.United States
通讯作者单位
Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Cellular Therapy Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Electronic address: peralesm@mskcc.org.United States
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2026 May 23
原文标识
PubMed 42178058 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2026.05.032