← 返回

在接受 BCMA CAR-T 治疗的复发/难治性患者中验证和优化高危多发性骨髓瘤(HRMM)的新共识基因组分期(CGS)

英文原题:Validation and refinement of the new Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS) of high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) in relapsed and refractory patients treated with BCMA CAR-T.

查看英文原题

Validation and refinement of the new Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS) of high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) in relapsed and refractory patients treated with BCMA CAR-T.

PubMed 2026/04/22(内容时间) Blood Cancer J Q1 · IF 13.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

高危多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的新共识基因组分期(CGS)最近由国际骨髓瘤学会和国际骨髓瘤工作组更新。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以在接受BCMA CAR-T 治疗的复发/难治性MM患者中验证修订后的HRMM标准。共纳入158例患者,其中75例(47%)符合HRMM标准。中位随访时间为24.8个月(95% CI 22.5-30.3)。在多变量分析中,接受BCMA CAR-T 后,HRMM患者的PFS(HR 1.89, p = 0.003)和OS(HR 3.06, p < 0.001)较标危MM(SRMM)显著缩短。LDH > 210 U/L和EMD也被确定为独立的不良危险因素。

基于生存分析,我们构建了一个将LDH和EMD纳入CGS-HRMM标准的重新分类分期系统。患者被分为四个离散的风险组:低危(伴LDH正常且无EMD的SRMM;n = 42, 26%)、中低危(伴LDH正常且无EMD的HRMM;n = 31, 20%)、中高危(伴高LDH、EMD或二者兼有的SRMM;n = 41, 26%)和高危(伴高LDH、EMD或二者兼有的HRMM;n = 44, 28%)。低危、中低危、中高危和高危疾病患者的中位PFS分别为35.0、19.6、10.4和6.6个月(p < 0.0001),估计24个月OS分别为90%、69%、66%和26%(p < 0.0001)。

总之,我们在接受BCMA CAR-T 治疗的复发/难治性MM患者中验证了新的CGS-HRMM标准。我们还提出了一种重新分类分期系统,以进一步改善接受BCMA CAR-T 治疗的MM患者的风险分层。

展开英文摘要原文

The new Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS) of high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) was recently updated by the International Myeloma Society and International Myeloma Working Group.

We performed a retrospective study to validate the revised HRMM criteria in relapsed and refractory MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T. A total of 158 patients were included, of whom 75 (47%) met criteria for HRMM. The median follow-up was 24. 8 months (95% CI 22. 5-30. 3). On multivariable analysis, patients with HRMM had significantly shorter PFS (HR 1. 89, p = 0. 003) and OS (HR 3. 06, p < 0. 001) compared to standard-risk MM (SRMM) following BCMA CAR-T. LDH > 210 U/L and EMD were also identified as independent adverse risk factors. Based on survival analyses, we constructed a reclassified staging system incorporating LDH and EMD into the CGS-HRMM criteria.

Patients were divided into four discrete risk groups: low risk (SRMM with normal LDH and no EMD; n = 42, 26%), intermediate-low risk (HRMM with normal LDH and no EMD; n = 31, 20%), intermediate-high risk (SRMM with high LDH, EMD, or both; n = 41, 26%), and high risk (HRMM with high LDH, EMD, or both; n = 44, 28%).

Patients with low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk disease had a median PFS of 35. 0, 19. 6, 10. 4, and 6. 6 months, respectively (p < 0. 0001), and an estimated 24-month OS of 90%, 69%, 66%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0. 0001). In summary, we validated the new CGS-HRMM criteria in relapsed and refractory MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T.

We also propose a reclassified staging system to further improve risk stratification in MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T.

论文信息

作者
Gustine JN、Attar N、Puliafito BR、Cirstea DD、Branagan AR、Yee AJ、Raje NS
第一作者单位
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. nraje@mgh.harvard.edu.United States
期刊
Blood cancer journal2026 Apr 22
原文标识
PubMed 42020379 · DOI 10.1038/s41408-026-01510-1