CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:A systematic review and meta-analysis of shRNA-IL-6-engineered CAR-T cells for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a stepping stone toward risk-free immunotherapy.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of shRNA-IL-6-engineered CAR-T cells for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a stepping stone toward risk-free immunotherapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
靶向CD19的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞临床应用是治疗复发/难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病的突破性进展。然而,预防免疫相关不良事件,如重度细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS),仍是一个重要的关注点。本meta分析探讨了白细胞介素-6敲低CAR-T 疗法的疗效和安全性。研究的主要结局包括CRS、ICANS的发生率,以及输注抗CD19 shRNA工程化CAR-T 细胞后一个月时达到早期完全缓解(CR)的患者数量和总体缓解(OR)率。采用随机效应模型估计汇总效应。使用GRADE评估证据确定性。在筛选的275项研究中,7项研究符合条件(n = 178例患者)。
汇总OR率和CR率分别为88%(95% CI:81-92)和84%(95% CI:78-89),未检测到异质性。在147例患者中,116例(78%,95% CI:68-85)发生CRS,而178例中有46例(28%,CI:21%-35%)受到重度(≥3级)影响。虽然在159例患者中有13例检测到ICANS(13%,CI:2%-51%,I2 = 69.5%),但三项研究证实无重度ICANS发生。根据GRADE评估,当前分析对所研究结局提供的证据确定性较低,但ICANS(任何级别)被认为极低。更重要的是,由于所有纳入研究均在中国进行,研究结果可能无法直接推广至其他医疗体系和种族多样化人群。
因此,我们对效应估计值的信心有限,其可能与真实估计值存在差异。
Clinical application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, especially those targeting CD19, stands as a breakthrough in treating relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Yet, preventing immune-related adverse events, like severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), remains a significant concern. This meta-analysis looked at the efficacy and safety of interleukin-6 knockdown CAR-T therapy. The study's primary outcomes included the incidence of CRS, ICANS, and the number of patients achieving an early complete response (CR) and overall response (OR) rates at one-month post-infusion of anti-CD19 shRNA-engineered CAR-T cells. The random-effects model was used to estimate summary effects. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.
Out of 275 studies screened, 7 studies were eligible (n = 178 patients). The pooled OR and CR rates were 88% (95% CI: 81-92) and 84% (95% CI: 78-89), respectively, with no heterogeneity detected. Among 147 patients, 116 (78%, 95% CI: 68-85) developed CRS, whereas 46 (28%, CI: 21%-35%) out of 178 were affected by severe grades ( 3). While ICANS was detected in 13 out of 159 patients (13%, CI: 2%-51%, I2 = 69.
5%), three studies confirmed the absence of severe grade ICANS. According to GRADE assessment, current analysis presents low certainty of evidence supporting investigated outcomes, except for ICANS (any grade) that was deemed very low. More importantly, as all included studies were conducted in China, the findings may not be readily generalizable to other healthcare systems and ethnically diverse populations.
Therefore, our confidence in the effect estimates is limited and it may vary from true estimates.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。