CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Data-informed optimization of CAR T-cell therapy long-term follow-up.
Data-informed optimization of CAR T-cell therapy long-term follow-up.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法给药后,广泛的长期随访(LTFU)要求和复杂的数据收集流程给患者和医疗服务提供者带来了重大挑战。为重新评估15年LTFU期是否仍具有科学合理性,我们召集了一个多利益相关方工作组,成员包括来自患者倡导组织、学术界、产业界和政府的代表。本分析纳入了新汇总的原始数据,涉及五种美国食品药品监督管理局批准的CAR-T 细胞疗法按年份报告的不良事件(AEs)复合百分比。结合此前已发表的研究,结果表明,输注后3年以上AEs报告并不常见,而继发性T细胞恶性肿瘤——基于CAR-T 细胞疗法作用机制最受关注的AE——主要在前2年内报告。基于当前累积的安全性数据,5年随访期在临床试验和商业环境中可能已具有科学充分性。
此外,我们提出了一种简化流程,利用技术进步将重点关注的安全性数据从电子健康记录自动传输至第三方数据库。为促进实施,我们建议使用现有平台对这一更新后的数据收集方法进行可行性测试。
我们还概述了 regulatory policy 考量,以最有效地推动这些建议的采纳。
Following administration of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, extensive long-term follow-up (LTFU) requirements and complex data collection processes have posed significant challenges for patients and providers. To reassess whether a 15-year LTFU period remains scientifically justified, we convened a multistakeholder working group that included representatives from patient advocacy groups, academia, industry, and government. This analysis incorporates newly aggregated primary data on composite percentages of adverse events (AEs) reported by year for five Food and Drug Administration-approved CAR T-cell therapies.
Combined with previously published research, the findings indicate that AEs are infrequently reported after 3 years post-infusion, and secondary T-cell malignancy-the AE of primary concern based on the mechanism of action of CAR T-cell therapy-has predominantly been reported within the first 2 years. Based on current cumulative safety data, a 5-year follow-up period may be scientifically sufficient in both clinical trial and commercial settings.
Additionally, we propose a streamlined process that leverages technological advancements to automate the transfer of focused safety data from electronic health records into a third-party database. To facilitate implementation, we recommend feasibility testing of this updated data collection approach using an established platform.
We also outline regulatory policy considerations to most effectively enable adoption of these recommendations.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。