← 返回

提高 CAR-T 治疗可及性:某学术医院替代创新模式的案例研究

英文原题:Increasing access to CAR-T therapy: a case study of an academic hospital's alternative innovation model.

查看英文原题

Increasing access to CAR-T therapy: a case study of an academic hospital's alternative innovation model.

PubMed 2026/04/10(内容时间) Orphanet J Rare Dis Q2 · IF 3.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

我们的发现强调了学术医院开发更可负担的先进疗法的潜力、有利监管框架的重要性,以及学术医院在扩展这一模式时面临的挑战。通过增加对学术医院的监管和财政支持、加强协调,以及附带可及性要求的公共资助,这一模式有望在尖端技术领域实现兼顾可负担性的创新。

研究思路结论见上方概要

罕见病药物成本的不断上升引发了人们对卫生系统可持续性和这些疗法公平可及性的担忧。更新且高效的孤儿药,如CAR-T 细胞疗法,凸显了对替代创新模式的需求,这些模式能够提供更高的可负担性和可及性。本案例研究考察了巴塞罗那医院诊所(HCB)的替代创新模式,该模式开发了 ARI-0001(varnimcabtagene autoleucel),一种用于某些形式白血病的新型 CAR-T 疗法,其价格比制药行业的同类疗法低三分之二。

我们进行了背景研究,并对HCB工作人员、地区卫生部门代表、西班牙卫生部和监管机构、学者、民间社会和患者团体进行了二十一次半结构化访谈。我们使用了一个框架,该框架借鉴了复杂适应系统的概念,纳入了所使用的资源(即资金、知识和制造能力)、所实施的实践(即知识管理、获取实践和透明度),以及塑造HCB与系统中其他行为者互动的规则和规范。随后,我们确定制度逻辑这一概念非常适合解释HCB的模式如何克服各种障碍。

HCB的模式建立在三种相互竞争的制度逻辑之上——医疗、学术和产业,同时也针对每种逻辑的弱点加以应对。医疗逻辑塑造了HCB对ARI-0001的可负担定价,但也带来了组织上的挑战。学术逻辑推动了HCB与同行分享知识和技术的意愿,但为资助后期临床试验和监管流程设置了障碍。最后,HCB通过识别内部监管专长并建立生产合作伙伴关系,采纳了产业逻辑。医院豁免条款——一种欧洲监管路径,允许医院在特定条件下开发和生产的治疗方法——使HCB能够跨越这三种相互竞争逻辑的边界。

展开英文摘要原文

Increasing costs of drugs for rare diseases have raised concerns about health systems sustainability and equitable access to these therapies. Newer and highly effective orphan drugs, such as Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) therapies, highlight the need for alternative innovation models that can offer greater affordability and accessibility. This case study examines Hospital Cl nic Barcelona s (HCB) alternative innovation model to develop ARI-0001 (varnimcabtagene autoleucel), a novel CAR-T therapy for certain forms of leukemia, at a price two-thirds lower than comparable therapies from the pharmaceutical industry.

We conducted background research, and performed twenty-one semi-structured interviews with HCB staff, representatives of regional Health Departments, the Spanish Ministry of Health and regulatory agency, academics, civil society and patient groups. We used a framework drawing on concepts from complex adaptive systems, incorporating the resources used (i.e., funding, knowledge, and manufacturing capacity), the practices implemented (i.e., knowledge management, access practices and transparency), and the rules and norms that shaped HCB s interactions with other actors in the system. We then identified the concept of institutional logics as well-suited to explain how HCB s model overcame various barriers.

HCB s model builds from three competing institutional logics healthcare, academic and industrial while also addressing each logic s weaknesses. The healthcare logic shaped HCB s affordable pricing of ARI-0001, but also posed organizational challenges. The academic logic drove HCB s willingness to share knowledge and technology with peers, but posed barriers to fund late-stage clinical trials and regulatory processes. Lastly, HCB adopted an industrial logic by identifying in-house regulatory expertise and developing partnerships for production. The hospital exemption clause, a European regulatory pathway that allows hospitals to develop and produce treatments under certain conditions, allowed HCB to span the boundaries of the three competing logics.

Our findings underscore the potential of academic hospitals to develop more affordable advanced therapies, the importance of conducive regulatory frameworks, and the challenges that academic hospitals face to expand this model. Through increased regulatory and financial support to academic hospitals, strengthened coordination, and public funding with requirements for access, this model could achieve innovation with affordability in a cutting-edge technological area.

论文信息

作者
Ruiz AA、Shinabargar E、Slovenski I、Large K、Vieira M、Moon S
单位
Global Health Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Chem. Eugène-Rigot 2, Genève, 1202, Switzerland. adrian.alonsor@estudiante.uam.es.Switzerland
期刊
Orphanet journal of rare diseases2026 Apr 10
原文标识
PubMed 41964091 · DOI 10.1186/s13023-026-04320-7