← 返回

血液系统恶性肿瘤中 CAR-T 细胞治疗相关不良事件的预测模型:系统综述与荟萃分析

英文原题:Prediction models for CAR-T Cell therapy-related adverse events in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

查看英文原题

Prediction models for CAR-T Cell therapy-related adverse events in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed 2026/04/06(内容时间) BMC Cancer Q2 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

合并 AUC 估计表明所纳入模型具有中等区分度。然而,这些估计反映的是不确定性下的区分能力,而非直接的临床就绪度。

研究思路结论见上方概要

识别不良事件高风险患者对于CAR-T 细胞治疗中实现早期干预至关重要。尽管已开发出众多预测模型,但其方法学质量和性能仍缺乏系统性评估。

我们在七个数据库和Google Scholar中进行了系统检索,涵盖截至2025年10月29日的所有记录。使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚风险和适用性。荟萃分析仅纳入外部验证队列的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)结果。进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析,以探索异质性的潜在来源。

共纳入29项研究,报告了26个不同的预测模型。最常见的预测因子为血小板计数、C反应蛋白和白细胞介素-6。10个模型进行了外部验证,6个报告了校准度。PROBAST评估显示所有研究均存在高偏倚风险。外部验证队列的合并AUC范围为0.60至0.79。

展开英文摘要原文

Identifying patients at high risk of adverse events is crucial in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy to enable early intervention. Despite the development of numerous prediction models, their methodological quality and performance remain systematically unassessed.

We conducted a systematic search across seven databases and Google Scholar, covering all records up to October 29, 2025. The risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Only the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) results from external validation cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

Twenty-nine studies were included, reporting 26 distinct prediction models. The most common predictors were platelet count, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6. Ten models underwent external validation, and six reported calibration. The PROBAST assessment indicated a high risk of bias across all studies. Pooled AUCs from external validation cohorts ranged from 0.60 to 0.79.

Pooled AUC estimates indicate moderate discrimination of the included models. However, these estimates reflect discriminative ability under uncertainty rather than direct clinical readiness.

论文信息

作者
Ye L、Liao L、Wang L、Zhao X、Zeng J、Xu X
第一作者单位
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China.China
通讯作者单位
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China. xxh@gzhmu.edu.cn.China
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
BMC cancer2026 Apr 6
原文标识
PubMed 41937143 · DOI 10.1186/s12885-026-15877-8