← 返回

接受 BCMA 靶向 CAR-T 治疗的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中 BCMA 表达的动态变化

英文原题:Dynamics of BCMA expression in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy.

查看英文原题

Dynamics of BCMA expression in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy.

PubMed 2026/04/04(内容时间) Blood Cancer J Q1 · IF 13.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

关于 BCMA CAR-T 治疗后复发时 BCMA 靶抗原表达动态变化的系统性数据有限。我们分析了 76 例接受标准治疗 BCMA 靶向 CAR-T 的患者,这些患者在基线(n = 50)、复发时(6)或两个时间点(20)使用流式细胞术(FC)和/或免疫组织化学(IHC)接受了实时 BCMA 表达评估。基线时 BCMA 普遍表达,且表达水平具有显著异质性。在区分高表达与低表达方面,FC 与 IHC 之间未见一致性(Spearman:0.07,Cohen kappa:0)。FC 检测的浆细胞 BCMA 表达与临床结局相关,而 IHC 则无关。

FC 检测的高 BCMA 表达与 VGPR/CR 可能性增加(p = 0.007)和至进展时间延长(p = 0.005)相关,包括 ciltacabtagene autoleucel 队列(中位:23.0 vs. 7.7 个月,p = 0.02)。复发患者经 FC 检测仍保留 BCMA 表达,尽管 29%(5/16)经 IHC 检测出现 BCMA 丢失,其中 4/5 经 FC 同时显示 BCMA 阳性表达。FC 检测的复发时 BCMA 表达显著低于基线(p = 0.04);在有配对样本的患者中,50%(8/16)发生下调(25% 下降)。FC 检测的较高 BCMA 表达与 BCMA 靶向 CAR-T 后获得深度、持久缓解的可能性较高相关。虽然 BCMA 丢失罕见,但复发时表达下降常见,这对 BCMA 靶向治疗的序贯具有意义。

展开英文摘要原文

There is limited systemic data on the dynamics of BCMA-target antigen expression with BCMA CAR-T at relapse.

We analyzed 76 patients receiving standard-of-care BCMA-directed CAR-T who underwent real-time BCMA expression evaluation at baseline (n = 50), relapse (6), or both (20) using flow cytometry (FC) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC). BCMA was universally expressed at baseline with significant heterogeneity in expression level. No concordance was seen between FC and IHC in categorizing high vs. low expression (Spearman: 0. 07, Cohen kappa: 0). Plasma cell BCMA expression by FC correlated with clinical outcomes, whereas IHC did not. High BCMA expression by FC was associated with increased likelihood for VGPR/CR (p = 0. 007) and longer time to progression (p = 0.

005), including the ciltacabtagene autoleucel cohort (median: 23. 0 vs. 7. 7 months, p = 0. 02). Relapsed patients retained BCMA expression by FC, though 29% (5/16) had BCMA loss by IHC, with 4/5 showing concurrent positive BCMA expression by FC. BCMA expression at relapse by FC was significantly lower than baseline (p = 0.

04); downregulation ( 25% decrease) occurred in 50% (8/16) with paired samples. Higher BCMA expression by FC correlated with higher likelihood of deep, durable responses following BCMA-directed CAR-T. While BCMA loss is rare, decreased expression is common at relapse, with implications for sequencing BCMA-directed therapies.

论文信息

作者
Rana MS、Fernandez-Pol S、Jensen A、Hovanky V、Velayati A、Oak JS、Silva O、Ames E
第一作者单位
Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Surbhi.Sidana@stanford.edu.United States
期刊
Blood cancer journal2026 Apr 4
原文标识
PubMed 41935039 · DOI 10.1038/s41408-026-01474-2