← 返回

模拟免疫治疗和化疗的最佳时机以预防三阴性乳腺癌的耐药和复发

英文原题:Modeling optimal timing of immunotherapy and chemotherapy to prevent resistance and recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer.

查看英文原题

Modeling optimal timing of immunotherapy and chemotherapy to prevent resistance and recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer.

PubMed 2026/04/01(内容时间) Sci Rep Q1 · IF 4.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的一个内在特征是其高度可塑性,导致异质性癌细胞亚群与免疫系统产生不同的相互作用。为解决TNBC可塑性问题,我们着手对源自小鼠TNBC样4T1细胞系的肿瘤细胞亚群动力学进行建模,基于实验结果开发了一个常微分方程(ODEs)系统,区分Sca1⁺(干细胞抗原1)和Sca1⁻细胞,并鉴定化疗耐药群体。该模型纳入了与免疫细胞的相互作用,包括自然杀伤(NK)细胞、T淋巴细胞和髓源性抑制细胞(MDSCs)。

我们通过多种治疗方案和组合,研究了化疗和抗MDSC免疫增强剂——分别为甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和Abequolixron——的效果。通过模拟探索了不同的治疗起始时间和免疫细胞杀伤率的变化。

我们的研究结果表明,治疗时机和给药顺序是治疗结局的关键决定因素。在免疫杀伤细胞振荡同步时——接近其局部峰值——启动化疗可促进肿瘤消除,而时机不当的治疗则导致肿瘤逃逸。消除肿瘤需要一个最佳的化疗暴露窗口;暴露时间过短或过长分别有利于MTX敏感细胞和MTX耐药细胞的逃逸。较长的MTX无药间期使肿瘤从休眠转向消除,提示复发风险降低。在化疗前给予免疫增强治疗拓宽了有效治疗窗口,而Abequolixron与MTX的联合治疗进一步改善了结局。这些结果首次提供了一个基于实验数据的定量数学框架,利用TNBC细胞可塑性来优化TNBC的联合化学免疫治疗 scheduling。

展开英文摘要原文

One intrinsic characteristic of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is its high plasticity, resulting in heterogeneous cancer cell subpopulations with distinct interactions with the immune system.

To address TNBC plasticity, we set to model the dynamics of tumor cell subpopulations derived from the murine TNBC-like 4T1 cell line, by developing a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) based on experimental results, distinguishing between Sca1⁺ (Stem Cell Antigen 1) and Sca1⁻ cells and identifying chemotherapy-resistant populations. The model incorporates interactions with immune cells, including natural killer (NK) cells, T lymphocytes, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs).

We investigated the effects of chemotherapy and anti-MDSC immune-boosting agent—methotrexate (MTX) and Abequolixron, respectively—through various treatment regimens and combinations. Simulations were conducted to explore different treatment initiation times and variations in immune cell killing rates.

Our findings suggest treatment timing and administration order as key determinants of therapeutic outcome. Initiating chemotherapy in synchrony with immune-killer cell oscillations—near their local peak—promoted tumor elimination, whereas mistimed treatment led to tumor escape. An optimal chemotherapy exposure window was required for elimination; exposures that were too short or prolonged favored escape of MTX-sensitive and MTX-resistant cells, respectively.

Longer MTX-free intervals shifted tumors from dormancy toward elimination, suggesting reduced recurrence risk. Administering immune-boosting therapy before chemotherapy broadened the effective therapeutic window, and combination treatment with Abequolixron and MTX further improved outcomes. These results provide, for the first time a quantitative mathematical framework based on experimental data, leveraging TNBC cell plasticity for optimizing combined chemo-immunotherapy scheduling in TNBC.

论文信息

作者
Daneshparvar M、Ghanizadeh M、Shariatpanahi SP、Goliaei B、Mehdizadeh R、Rüegg C
第一作者单位
Laboratory of Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.Iran
通讯作者单位
Laboratory of Experimental and Translational Oncology, Pathology, Department of Oncology, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland. curzio.ruegg@unifr.ch.Switzerland
期刊
Scientific reports2026 Apr 1
原文标识
PubMed 41922423 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-44611-4