← 返回

CD19/22 与 CD19 CAR-T 免疫治疗在伴 TP53 改变的复发/难治性 B-ALL 中的疗效比较及长期生存

英文原题:Comparative efficacy and long-term survival of CD19/22 versus CD19 CAR-T immunotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL with TP53 alterations.

查看英文原题

Comparative efficacy and long-term survival of CD19/22 versus CD19 CAR-T immunotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL with TP53 alterations.

PubMed 2026/03/30(内容时间) J Transl Med Q1 · IF 9.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

CD19/22 CAR-T 免疫治疗,尤其是在后续进行 allo-HSCT 时,代表了一种对伴有 TP53 改变的 R/R B-ALL 有前景且临床有效的治疗范式。

研究思路结论见上方概要

携带 TP53 异常的难治/复发(R/R)B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)患者因深度化疗耐药而预后极差。尽管 CD19 CAR-T 细胞疗法已改变了治疗格局,但其在这一高危亚群中的长期疗效仍然有限。双靶点 CD19/22 CAR-T 已被开发用于增强抗肿瘤活性;然而,其相对于 CD19 CAR-T 在这一高危人群中的疗效比较及长期生存情况仍不明确,需要进一步阐明以指导临床决策。

本研究纳入55例TP53异常的R/R B-ALL患者,这些患者入组临床试验(NCT03919240、NCT03275493和NCT03614858),并接受CD19(n = 27)或CD19/22(n = 28)CAR-T 治疗。评估的结局包括完全缓解(CR)率、微小残留病(MRD)阴性CR率、总生存期(OS)、无白血病生存期(LFS)和累积复发率(CIR)。采用多因素Cox回归模型估计OS和LFS的风险比(HR)。

两组的 CR 率均较高(CD19/22:100%;CD19:88.89%)。值得注意的是,CD19/22 CAR-T 治疗的 MRD 阴性 CR 率更高(75.00% vs. 29.63%,p = 0.0011),并被证实为独立的不良预后因素。CD19/22 CAR-T 还显示出明显更好的长期生存,3 年 OS(59.55% vs. 25.49%,p = 0.0050)和 LFS(57.29% vs. 17.64%,p = 0.0047)率。在 32 例 CAR-T 后接受巩固性 allo-HSCT 的患者中,CD19/22 CAR-T 组获得了更优的 3 年生存(OS:72.34% vs. 30.77%,p = 0.0089;LFS:76.69% vs. 23.07%,p = 0.0041)和更低的 CIR(23.30% vs. 75.00%,p = 0.0182)。多因素分析确定 CD19/22 CAR-T 治疗和桥接 allo-HSCT 是改善 LFS 的独立预测因素。

展开英文摘要原文

Patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) harboring TP53 alterations have a dismal prognosis due to profound chemoresistance. While CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shifted the treatment landscape, long-term efficacy in this high-risk subset remains limited. The dual-target CD19/22 CAR-T has been developed to enhance anti-tumor activity; however, its comparative efficacy and long-term survival relative to CD19 CAR-T in this high-risk population remain unclear and require further elucidation to inform clinical decision-making.

This study included 55 patients with TP53-altered R/R B-ALL who were enrolled in clinical trials (NCT03919240, NCT03275493, and NCT03614858) and treated with either CD19 (n = 27) or CD19/22 (n = 28) CAR-T therapy. The outcomes assessed included the complete remission (CR) rate, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR rate, overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and LFS.

The CR rate was high in both groups (CD19/22: 100%; CD19: 88.89%). Notably, the MRD-negative CR rate was higher with CD19/22 CAR-T therapy (75.00% vs. 29.63%, p = 0.0011), and was confirmed as an independent favorable prognostic factor. The CD19/22 CAR-T also demonstrated markedly better long-term survival, with 3-year OS (59.55% vs. 25.49%, p = 0.0050) and LFS (57.29% vs. 17.64%, p = 0.0047) rates. Among the 32 patients who underwent consolidative allo-HSCT after CAR-T, the CD19/22 CAR-T group achieved superior 3-year survival (OS: 72.34% vs. 30.77%, p = 0.0089; LFS: 76.69% vs. 23.07%, p = 0.0041) and lower CIR (23.30% vs. 75.00%, p = 0.0182). Multivariable analysis established CD19/22 CAR-T therapy and bridging to allo-HSCT as independent predictors of improved LFS.

CD19/22 CAR-T immunotherapy, particularly when followed by allo-HSCT, represents a promising and clinically effective treatment paradigm for R/R B-ALL with TP53 alterations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A single-center retrospective clinical study.

论文信息

作者
Tang Y、Li M、Cui Q、Liu S、Li T、Qiu H、Kang L、Yu L
第一作者单位
National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.China
通讯作者单位
National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China. xwtang1020@163.com.China
文献类型
临床试验 · 对照研究 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal of translational medicine2026 Mar 30
原文标识
PubMed 41913205 · DOI 10.1186/s12967-026-07974-w