← 返回

复发多发性骨髓瘤的挽救性或第二次自体 SCT(2016-2026):十年回顾

英文原题:Salvage or Second Autologous SCT in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (2016-2026): A Decade in Review.

查看英文原题

Salvage or Second Autologous SCT in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (2016-2026): A Decade in Review.

PubMed 2026/02/28(内容时间) Curr Oncol Q2 · IF 3.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

过去十年,随着新型药物、维持治疗策略和细胞免疫疗法的引入,第二次或挽救性自体干细胞移植(ASCT2)在复发多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中的作用已发生实质性演变。在当代,ASCT2的临床价值需要基于现代真实世界和前瞻性数据重新评估。

我们对2016年1月至2026年1月期间发表在PubMed索引上的研究进行了针对性文献综述,这些研究评估了第二次或挽救性自体移植在复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤成人患者中的应用。纳入的研究包括回顾性注册分析、真实世界队列和前瞻性随机试验,重点关注可行性、毒性、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和预后决定因素。14项关键研究构成了核心证据基础,并辅以指南声明和比较性免疫治疗数据。

在大型注册和机构系列研究中,ASCT2始终可行,非复发死亡率低(第100天至1年≤5%)。中位PFS范围为9.8至30.2个月,中位OS约为30至>80个月,结局受首次ASCT后缓解持续时间强烈影响。首次ASCT后≥24个月复发的患者获益最大,在有利风险亚组中达到中位PFS 17-45个月,OS超过60个月。ASCT2后维持治疗,尤其是以来那度胺或卡非佐米为基础的方案,在随机和真实世界研究中显著延长了疾病控制时间。相反,III期GMMG ReLApsE试验未能证明常规挽救性ASCT相较于持续来那度胺为基础的治疗具有生存优势,这凸显了患者选择的重要性。在高度难治或血细胞减少的人群中,ASCT2提供了适度的疾病控制,但能够实现造血恢复并获得后续治疗的机会。

在现代治疗格局中,对于经过仔细筛选的复发性多发性骨髓瘤患者,尤其是化疗敏感且初次缓解时间较长的患者,二次或挽救性自体移植仍然是一种有效、安全且合理的策略。ASCT2应以风险适应性的方式与维持治疗和新兴免疫疗法相结合,作为持久的巩固或桥接手段,而非所有复发患者的常规治疗。

展开英文摘要原文

Background: The role of second or salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT2) in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved substantially over the past decade with the introduction of novel agents, maintenance strategies, and cellular immunotherapies. The clinical value of ASCT2 in the contemporary era requires reappraisal based on modern real-world and prospective data. Methods: We conducted a targeted literature review of PubMed-indexed studies published between January 2016 and January 2026 evaluating second or salvage autologous transplantation in adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Retrospective registry analyses, real-world cohorts, and prospective randomized trials were included, focusing on feasibility, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic determinants. Fourteen key studies formed the core evidence base, supplemented by guideline statements and comparative immunotherapy data. Results: Across large registry and institutional series, ASCT2 was consistently feasible with low non-relapse mortality (≤5% at day 100-1 year). The median PFS ranged from 9. 8 to 30. 2 months and the median OS from approximately 30 to >80 months, with outcomes strongly influenced by duration of remission after first ASCT.

Patients relapsing ≥24 months after ASCT1 derived the greatest benefit, achieving a median PFS of 17-45 months and OS exceeding 60 months in favorable-risk subgroups. Post-ASCT2 maintenance, particularly with lenalidomide or carfilzomib-based regimens, significantly prolonged disease control in randomized and real-world studies. Conversely, the phase III GMMG ReLApsE trial did not demonstrate a survival advantage for routine salvage ASCT over continuous lenalidomide-based therapy, highlighting the importance of patient selection.

In heavily refractory or cytopenic populations, ASCT2 provided modest disease control but enabled hematopoietic recovery and access to subsequent therapies. Conclusions: In the modern treatment landscape, second or salvage autologous transplantation remains a valid, safe, and effective strategy for carefully selected patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, particularly those with chemosensitive disease and prolonged initial remissions.

ASCT2 should be integrated in a risk-adapted manner alongside maintenance therapy and emerging immunotherapies, serving as a durable consolidation or bridging approach rather than routine therapy for all relapsed patients.

论文信息

作者
Nassar M、Alzaidy N、Nasiri A、Hanbali A、Aljurf MA、Mohammed Saleh MF
单位
Adult Hematology, Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Department, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia.Saudi Arabia
文献类型
综述
期刊
Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026 Feb 28
原文标识
PubMed 41892168 · DOI 10.3390/curroncol33030140