← 返回前沿论文

接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗或其他系统性抗肿瘤治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者的第二原发恶性肿瘤风险:一项真实世界对比研究

英文原题:Second Primary Malignancy Risk in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Receiving CAR T-cell Therapy or Other Systemic Anticancer Treatments: A Real-World Comparative Study.

PubMed 2026/09/15(内容时间) Clin Cancer Res Q1 · IF 10.9(JCR 2025)

研究概要

在这一随访时间相对较短的真实世界数据集中,与其他全身性抗肿瘤治疗相比,多发性骨髓瘤患者在接受 CAR-T 治疗后似乎具有更高的血液系统第二原发恶性肿瘤风险。

中文摘要

目的:比较接受嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞治疗与其他系统性抗肿瘤治疗(SACT)的多发性骨髓瘤患者发生第二原发恶性肿瘤(SPM)的风险。 研究设计:研究人员从 Komodo Health 理赔数据中识别开始接受 CAR-T 治疗或其他 SACT 的成年多发性骨髓瘤患者,并通过加权平衡基线特征。研究估算了 24 个月内 SPM 的累积发生率,并计算 0 至 24 个月期间差异的 P 值。 结果:研究纳入 435 例接受 CAR-T 治疗的患者和 12,268 例接受其他 SACT 的患者(中位随访时间为 11.8 个月)。与其他 SACT 相比,CAR-T 治疗与任何 SPM 风险相近(24 个月时为 24.1% vs. 22.3%;0–24 个月的 P 值 = 0.31),实体瘤 SPM 风险也相近(9.1% vs. 11.5%;0–24 个月的 P 值 = 0.32),但血液系统 SPM 风险显著更高(17.9% vs. 13.1%;0–24 个月的 P 值 = 0.04)。在一项要求通过 2 次理赔记录识别 SPM 的敏感性分析中,血液系统 SPM 风险差异减弱(5.5% vs. 4.9%;0–24 个月的 P 值 = 0.08)。值得注意的是,CAR-T 治疗后骨髓检查更常见(例如治疗后 0–3 个月为 47% vs. 13%)。 结论:在这组随访时间相对较短的真实世界数据中,与其他 SACT 相比,接受 CAR-T 治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者似乎有更高的血液系统 SPM 风险。然而,不能排除分类错误和检测偏倚的影响。这一关联仍需进一步评估。医生应警惕 CAR-T 治疗后的髓系恶性肿瘤。

展开英文摘要原文

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the risk of second primary malignancy (SPM) between patients with multiple myeloma who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy versus other systemic anticancer therapies (SACT). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Adult patients with multiple myeloma who initiated CAR T therapy or other SACT were identified from Komodo Health claims data and weighted to balance baseline characteristics. Cumulative incidence of SPM was estimated over 24 months, and P values were calculated for the difference between 0 and 24 months. RESULTS: The study included 435 patients who received CAR T therapy and 12,268 patients who received other SACT (median follow-up, 11.8 months). Compared with other SACT, CAR T therapy was associated with similar risks of any SPM (at 24 months, 24.1% vs. 22.3%; P0-24 months = 0.31) and solid SPM (9.1% vs. 11.5%, P0-24 months = 0.32) but significantly higher risk of hematologic SPM (17.9% vs. 13.1%, P0-24 months = 0.04). In a sensitivity analysis requiring 2 claims to identify an SPM, difference in hematologic SPM risk was attenuated (5.5% vs. 4.9%, P0-24 months = 0.08). Notably, bone marrow examinations were more common after CAR T therapy (e.g., 47% vs. 13% at 0-3 months). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world dataset with relatively short follow-up, patients with multiple myeloma seemed to have a higher risk of hematologic SPM after CAR T therapy compared with other SACT. However, misclassification and detection bias cannot be ruled out. The association warrants further evaluation. Physicians should be vigilant for myeloid malignancies after CAR T therapy.

论文信息

作者
Suvannasankha A、Li M、Omofuma O、Hampp C、Phelan M、Breskin A、Shao P、Roccia T
第一作者单位
Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.Italy
通讯作者单位
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.United States
文献类型
对照研究
期刊
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026 Sep 15
原文标识
PubMed 42283723 · DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-4068