CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Modeling and Simulation in Development and Regulatory Approval of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies: An Analysis of European Medicines Agency Centralized Procedures From 2018 to 2024.
Modeling and Simulation in Development and Regulatory Approval of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies: An Analysis of European Medicines Agency Centralized Procedures From 2018 to 2024.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法代表了肿瘤学的重大进展。这些疗法已展现出治疗潜力,尤其是在患者复发或对既往治疗难治的血液系统恶性肿瘤中。尽管前景广阔,CAR-T 细胞疗法的开发仍面临挑战。生产流程复杂且需针对每位患者个体化定制,符合条件的患者群体较小,传统临床试验设计往往不太适用。
本研究探讨了2014年至2024年间在欧洲获批的CAR-T 细胞疗法中模型引导与模拟的应用。通过分析六种已授权产品的监管文件,识别并归类了与药代动力学、疗效、安全性和获益-风险评估相关的监管问题。这些问题被系统性地组织成一个跨越多个生物学层面的结构化知识库。这些问题中不到一半在初始上市授权时得到解决,其余数据通过上市后承诺提交。大多数建模工作集中于药代动力学,与疗效和安全性相关的建模较少且鲜有探索。研究采用结构化可信度框架,将这些建模方法与传统分析方法进行基准比较。研究揭示了各申报中所使用的模型引导与模拟方法在方法学成熟度上存在不一致。与科学文献中描述的模型相比,监管申报中使用的模型通常更简单且数量更少,表明迄今为止M&S方法在监管环境中的实施仍较为有限。本文开发的资源库可能有助于提高监管评估的一致性和透明度,并支持在复杂疗法的整个开发生命周期中更广泛地采用基于模型的方法。
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies represent a major advancement in oncology. These therapies have demonstrated therapeutic potential, particularly in hematological malignancies where patients have relapsed or are refractory to prior treatments. Despite their promise, the development of CAR-T cell therapies is challenging. Manufacturing processes are complex and individualized for each patient, the eligible patient population is small, and conventional clinical trial designs are often not well suited.
This study investigates the use of modeling and simulation for CAR-T cell therapies approved in Europe between 2014 and 2024. Regulatory documents for six authorized products were analyzed to identify and categorize regulatory questions relating to pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and benefit-risk assessment. These questions were systematically organized into a structured repository spanning multiple biological levels. Fewer than half of these questions were addressed at initial marketing authorization, with additional data submitted through post-marketing commitments. Most modeling efforts were devoted to pharmacokinetics, with fewer relating to efficacy and safety being rarely explored.
A structured credibility framework was employed to benchmark these modeling approaches against conventional analytical methods. The study revealed inconsistent methodological maturity for modeling and simulation approaches used across submissions.
Compared with models described in the scientific literature, those used in regulatory applications were generally simpler and lesser, indicating a more limited implementation of M&S approaches in regulatory contexts so far. The repository developed herein may facilitate improved consistency and transparency in regulatory evaluation and support the broader adoption of model-based approaches throughout the development lifecycle of complex therapies.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。