← 返回

CAR-T 细胞时代多发性骨髓瘤维持更高干细胞采集阈值的成本效益

英文原题:Cost-Effectiveness of Maintaining Higher Stem-Cell Collection Thresholds in the Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Era for Multiple Myeloma.

查看英文原题

Cost-Effectiveness of Maintaining Higher Stem-Cell Collection Thresholds in the Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Era for Multiple Myeloma.

PubMed 2026/03/20(内容时间) JCO Clin Cancer Inform Q2 · IF 3.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

为 CAR-T 受者主动采集干细胞可减少感染并发症并适度改善感染相关生存,但普遍应用时在经济上仍不利。针对长期血细胞减少风险最高患者的风险适应策略,可能更好地平衡临床获益与成本效益。

研究思路结论见上方概要

持续性血细胞减少是多发性骨髓瘤 CAR-T 细胞治疗后常见的并发症,会增加严重感染的风险。输注先前采集的自体干细胞可能降低这一风险,但主动采集的临床和经济影响仍不确定。

我们开发了一个为期8年、每月周期的Markov模型,模拟10,000名接受CAR-T 治疗的患者。比较了两种策略:(1)不进行干细胞支持治疗,(2)对长期血细胞减少的患者提供干细胞支持治疗。中性粒细胞减少、感染和感染相关死亡率的转移概率来自CARTITUDE-4和已发表的干细胞支持治疗报告。成本包括严重感染住院费用和前期干细胞储备采集费用。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析。

在基础病例中,普遍储备采集将严重感染从每10,000名患者约650例降至约260例,并避免了约50例感染相关死亡。然而,boost组的平均每患者费用更高(约19,700美元[USD] vs 4,500美元USD),反映出每患者17,918美元USD的总储备采集成本加上较低的残余感染相关住院费用。两组的生存结局相似,复发相关死亡率在长期结局中占主导地位。敏感性分析证实了稳健性,住院成本和储备采集成本被确定为最具影响力的参数。

展开英文摘要原文

Prolonged cytopenias are a common complication after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma, increasing the risk of severe infection. Infusion of previously collected autologous stem cells may mitigate this risk, but the clinical and economic implications of proactive collection remain uncertain.

We developed an 8-year, monthly cycle Markov model simulating 10,000 patients undergoing CAR T therapy. Two strategies were compared: (1) no stem-cell boost and (2) availability of a boost for patients with prolonged cytopenias. Transition probabilities for neutropenia, infection, and infection-related mortality were derived from CARTITUDE-4 and published stem-cell boost reports. Costs included hospitalizations for severe infection and upfront stem-cell reserve collection. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

In the base case, universal reserve collection reduced severe infections from approximately 650 to approximately 260 per 10,000 patients and averted approximately 50 infection-related deaths. However, average per-patient costs were higher in the boost arm (approximately $19,700 US dollars [USD] v $4,500 USD), reflecting a gross reserve collection cost of $17,918 USD per patient plus lower residual infection-related hospitalization costs. Survival outcomes were similar between arms, with relapse-related mortality dominating long-term outcomes. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, with hospitalization cost and reserve collection cost identified as the most influential parameters.

Proactive stem-cell collection for CAR T recipients reduces infectious complications and modestly improves infection-related survival but remains economically unfavorable when applied universally. A risk-adapted approach targeting patients at highest risk of prolonged cytopenias may better balance clinical benefit with cost-effectiveness.

论文信息

作者
Malek E、Betts B、Herr M、Davila M、Holtan S、Driscoll JJ、Yu H
单位
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.United States
期刊
JCO clinical cancer informatics2026 Mar
原文标识
PubMed 41861264 · DOI 10.1200/CCI-25-00308